From Dead-ends to Dialogue: Third Workshop on Design Research & GenAI

In this third installment of our GenAI workshop series at DIS, we focus on ‘stopsigns’—the blockages that impede progress in design research with GenAI. These stopsigns manifest as both semantic barriers (political, social, or mental frameworks) and pragmatic hurdles (technical limitations or implementation challenges) that persist despite the rapid advancements since the GenAI boom. Such stopsigns present a productive tension—they often contain partial truths worthy of consideration while simultaneously being shortsighted in ways that prevent progression. From blanket rejection to uncritical acceptance, these barriers affect how meaningfully we engage with GenAI’s potential. Our workshop welcomes both returning and first-time participants to share their experiences with these persistent challenges and work together to develop practical solutions. Through analysis of real cases and hands-on activities, we’ll build strategies for moving beyond these obstacles while acknowledging their legitimate concerns. Our goal is to foster more thoughtful integration of GenAI in design research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3715668.3734170
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Dead-ends to Dialogue: Third Workshop on Design Research & GenAI

Frode Guribye, Vera van der Burg, Péter Kun, Petra Jääskeläinen et al.
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

From Dead-ends to Dialogue: Third Workshop on Design Research & GenAI

Frode Guribye, Vera van der Burg, Péter Kun, Petra Jääskeläinen, Joseph Lindley, Pavel Okopnyi, Timothy Merritt, Brett A. Halperin, Willem van der Maden, Derek Lomas, Maria Luce Lupetti, Jichen Zhu
article en

Abstract

In this third installment of our GenAI workshop series at DIS, we focus on ‘stopsigns’—the blockages that impede progress in design research with GenAI. These stopsigns manifest as both semantic barriers (political, social, or mental frameworks) and pragmatic hurdles (technical limitations or implementation challenges) that persist despite the rapid advancements since the GenAI boom. Such stopsigns present a productive tension—they often contain partial truths worthy of consideration while simultaneously being shortsighted in ways that prevent progression. From blanket rejection to uncritical acceptance, these barriers affect how meaningfully we engage with GenAI’s potential. Our workshop welcomes both returning and first-time participants to share their experiences with these persistent challenges and work together to develop practical solutions. Through analysis of real cases and hands-on activities, we’ll build strategies for moving beyond these obstacles while acknowledging their legitimate concerns. Our goal is to foster more thoughtful integration of GenAI in design research and practice.

Politecnico di Torino (IT), University of Washington (US), University of Bergen (NO), Lancaster University (GB), IT University of Copenhagen (DK), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE), Aalborg University (DK), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.