Evaluation of oven baking and air-frying as potential alternatives of deep frying, considering PM2.5 and PAHs emissions from cooking animal- and plant-based protein foods

• Deep-frying produces significantly higher PM 2.5 and PAHs emissions compared to oven-baking and air-frying. • To reduce pollutants effectively, adopting widely accepted oven-baking or consuming more plant-based protein is recommended to minimize hazardous emission and associated health risks. With most people spending more time indoors than outdoors, indoor pollution is considered having profound impacts on health. In Asian countries, high-temperature cooking oil fumes (COFs) are a major indoor air pollution source. Previous studies indicate variations in aerosol types and concentrations during deep-frying are attributed to differences in of ingredient composition such as foods cooked and oil used. The goal is to compare PM 2.5 and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) emissions during deep-frying, oven-baking, and air-frying of plant-based (tofu) and animal-based (chicken) protein foods with soybean oil and to evaluate sensory acceptability of the produced foods in order to identify alternative cooking methods with lower emission but equivalent food tastes. We monitored emitted PAHs, PM 2.5 , and particle size-specific mass and number concentrations of fine particles in eight replicates during cooking. Moreover, acceptance tests were conducted employing a nine-point Hedonic Scale regarding appearance, aroma, flavor, mouthfeel, aftertaste, and overall acceptance for different protein sources and cooking methods. Regarding particle matters, irrespective of the foods, deep-frying demonstrated higher particle mass and number concentrations compared to oven-baking and air-frying. Both mass and number concentrations for chicken were substantially higher than those for tofu, especially in the Accumulation mode and Aitken mode with diameters below 1000 nm. Tofu exhibited extremely low PAHs emissions across all cooking methods, while chicken showed significantly higher PAHs emissions during deep-frying than the other two cooking methods, with an accumulating effect over time. In sensory evaluation, although deep-frying still achieved the highest scores, oven-baking also received favorable ratings. It even surpassed deep-frying in certain aspects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Food Research
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of oven baking and air-frying as potential alternatives of deep frying, considering PM2.5 and PAHs emissions from cooking animal- and plant-based protein foods

Shih‐Chun Candice Lung, Kuang-Mao Chiang, Wen‐Harn Pan, Szu-Yun Wu et al.
1 citations
Applied Food Research
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Evaluation of oven baking and air-frying as potential alternatives of deep frying, considering PM2.5 and PAHs emissions from cooking animal- and plant-based protein foods

Shih‐Chun Candice Lung, Kuang-Mao Chiang, Wen‐Harn Pan, Szu-Yun Wu, Yu‐Cheng Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Deep-frying produces significantly higher PM 2.5 and PAHs emissions compared to oven-baking and air-frying. • To reduce pollutants effectively, adopting widely accepted oven-baking or consuming more plant-based protein is recommended to minimize hazardous emission and associated health risks. With most people spending more time indoors than outdoors, indoor pollution is considered having profound impacts on health. In Asian countries, high-temperature cooking oil fumes (COFs) are a major indoor air pollution source. Previous studies indicate variations in aerosol types and concentrations during deep-frying are attributed to differences in of ingredient composition such as foods cooked and oil used. The goal is to compare PM 2.5 and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) emissions during deep-frying, oven-baking, and air-frying of plant-based (tofu) and animal-based (chicken) protein foods with soybean oil and to evaluate sensory acceptability of the produced foods in order to identify alternative cooking methods with lower emission but equivalent food tastes. We monitored emitted PAHs, PM 2.5 , and particle size-specific mass and number concentrations of fine particles in eight replicates during cooking. Moreover, acceptance tests were conducted employing a nine-point Hedonic Scale regarding appearance, aroma, flavor, mouthfeel, aftertaste, and overall acceptance for different protein sources and cooking methods. Regarding particle matters, irrespective of the foods, deep-frying demonstrated higher particle mass and number concentrations compared to oven-baking and air-frying. Both mass and number concentrations for chicken were substantially higher than those for tofu, especially in the Accumulation mode and Aitken mode with diameters below 1000 nm. Tofu exhibited extremely low PAHs emissions across all cooking methods, while chicken showed significantly higher PAHs emissions during deep-frying than the other two cooking methods, with an accumulating effect over time. In sensory evaluation, although deep-frying still achieved the highest scores, oven-baking also received favorable ratings. It even surpassed deep-frying in certain aspects.

Applied Food ResearchVol. 5(2)
National Health Research Institutes (TW), Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica (TW), Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW)
Academia Sinica, Taipei Medical University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.