Cash grants to informal firms after Cyclone Idai: beyond the null

This study investigates the effects of unconditional cash grants on informal manufacturing firms' recovery after Cyclone Idai struck Mozambique in 2019. Using a novel stratified adaptive cluster sampling approach, we collected representative panel data from firms in Beira (heavily affected) and Chimoio (less affected). Many firms demonstrated rapid initial recovery without financial intervention, but did not sustain this over time. Although the overall effect of the grants on the full sample is not statistically significant, important heterogeneity in treatment effects did emerge. In Beira, the grants positively influenced firm recovery, whereas no significant effects were observed in Chimoio. Within Beira, the grants were particularly beneficial for firms that suffered greater damage, employed more workers, operated in the carpentry subsector, and invested the funds in machinery or tools. We explore potential explanations of the overall null result, including rapid self-recovery and the unique challenges faced by manufacturing firms, while highlighting the importance of targeting specific subgroups in future disaster recovery efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disasters
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12689
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cash grants to informal firms after Cyclone Idai: beyond the null

Hanna Berkel, Peter Fisker, Finn Tarp
1 citations
Disasters
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
article

Cash grants to informal firms after Cyclone Idai: beyond the null

Hanna Berkel, Peter Fisker, Finn Tarp
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of unconditional cash grants on informal manufacturing firms' recovery after Cyclone Idai struck Mozambique in 2019. Using a novel stratified adaptive cluster sampling approach, we collected representative panel data from firms in Beira (heavily affected) and Chimoio (less affected). Many firms demonstrated rapid initial recovery without financial intervention, but did not sustain this over time. Although the overall effect of the grants on the full sample is not statistically significant, important heterogeneity in treatment effects did emerge. In Beira, the grants positively influenced firm recovery, whereas no significant effects were observed in Chimoio. Within Beira, the grants were particularly beneficial for firms that suffered greater damage, employed more workers, operated in the carpentry subsector, and invested the funds in machinery or tools. We explore potential explanations of the overall null result, including rapid self-recovery and the unique challenges faced by manufacturing firms, while highlighting the importance of targeting specific subgroups in future disaster recovery efforts.

DisastersVol. 49(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK), One World University (MZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cash grants to informal firms after Cyclone Idai: beyond the null — Hanna Berkel, Peter Fisker, et al. · Disasters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS