From the Daily Peer Review of Abnormal Pap Test Slides to the Monitoring of Individual and Laboratory Performances: 5 Years of Data Collection and New Potential (Key) Performance Indicators

The levels of agreement are influenced by cytologist experience and team turnover. We propose new potential (key) performance indicators to strictly monitor the occurrence of systematic differences in interpretation criteria among cytologists. The proposed reference values are based on preliminary data and should be validated prospectively over a longer monitoring period.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cytopathology
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.70006
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the Daily Peer Review of Abnormal Pap Test Slides to the Monitoring of Individual and Laboratory Performances: 5 Years of Data Collection and New Potential (Key) Performance Indicators

Francesca Carozzi, Stefania Cannistrà, Marco Meoni, Giuseppe Gorini et al.
Cytopathology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

From the Daily Peer Review of Abnormal Pap Test Slides to the Monitoring of Individual and Laboratory Performances: 5 Years of Data Collection and New Potential (Key) Performance Indicators

Francesca Carozzi, Stefania Cannistrà, Marco Meoni, Giuseppe Gorini, Irene Paganini, Giampaolo Pompeo, Cristina Sani, Donella Puliti, Claudia Giachini, Marzia Matucci, Chiara Di Stefano, Ornella Cutaia
article en

Abstract

The levels of agreement are influenced by cytologist experience and team turnover. We propose new potential (key) performance indicators to strictly monitor the occurrence of systematic differences in interpretation criteria among cytologists. The proposed reference values are based on preliminary data and should be validated prospectively over a longer monitoring period.

CytopathologyVol. 36(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.