Challenges and best practices during the development of FEMA's National Risk Index

This study examines the development of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) National Risk Index (NRI), highlighting key challenges and effective strategies identified during its development. Semi-structured interviews with FEMA officials and contributing experts provided insights into methodological challenges, data management complexities, and inter-agency dynamics. The findings emphasised the significance of interdisciplinary collaboration, the early involvement of technical specialists, and iterative design processes. The study highlights the necessity for transparent documentation of methodological limitations and underscores the importance of effective stakeholder engagement and adaptive approaches. These insights can guide future national risk assessment initiatives aiming to enhance resilience and support informed decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105683
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and best practices during the development of FEMA's National Risk Index

Konstantinos Karagiorgos, Tonje Grahn
1 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
article

Challenges and best practices during the development of FEMA's National Risk Index

Konstantinos Karagiorgos, Tonje Grahn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the development of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) National Risk Index (NRI), highlighting key challenges and effective strategies identified during its development. Semi-structured interviews with FEMA officials and contributing experts provided insights into methodological challenges, data management complexities, and inter-agency dynamics. The findings emphasised the significance of interdisciplinary collaboration, the early involvement of technical specialists, and iterative design processes. The study highlights the necessity for transparent documentation of methodological limitations and underscores the importance of effective stakeholder engagement and adaptive approaches. These insights can guide future national risk assessment initiatives aiming to enhance resilience and support informed decision-making.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 127
Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (SE), Karlstad University (SE)
Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd och Beredskap, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.