Exploring strategies for the identification of triangles by students with learning difficulties: an eye-tracking study

Abstract Understanding geometric concepts is an important factor for coping with everyday life. This is also important for students with learning difficulties (LD)—students with significant and persistent difficulties in several school subjects, yet little is known about the understanding of geometric concepts of students with LD: The few previous studies have focused on their overall mathematical performance (usually looking at their products). This study focuses on the identification of triangles—an essential activity with respect to students’ understanding of geometric concepts. The aim of this study is to investigate if fifth grade students with LD ( n = 20) differ from students without LD ( n = 165) in the identification of triangles. We analyzed students’ error rates and use of strategies using eye tracking. We found that for representatives of triangles, students with LD used quick strategies, that is, strategies involving only few gazes, more often than students without LD and tended to make fewer errors. For non-representatives, however, we found that students with LD tended to use analytic strategies through attending to more parts of the shapes more often than students without LD but made more errors. The results indicate that students with LD differed from students without LD in the identification of triangles, and that students with LD not only have difficulties in mathematics, but also show certain strengths in geometry. However, the results also indicate that educators need to support students, especially with LD, in attending to critical attributes of triangles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics Education Research Journal
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-025-00531-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring strategies for the identification of triangles by students with learning difficulties: an eye-tracking study

Maike Schindler, Anna Lisa Simon, Benjamin Rott
2 citations
Mathematics Education Research Journal
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
4.24
article

Exploring strategies for the identification of triangles by students with learning difficulties: an eye-tracking study

Maike Schindler, Anna Lisa Simon, Benjamin Rott
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding geometric concepts is an important factor for coping with everyday life. This is also important for students with learning difficulties (LD)—students with significant and persistent difficulties in several school subjects, yet little is known about the understanding of geometric concepts of students with LD: The few previous studies have focused on their overall mathematical performance (usually looking at their products). This study focuses on the identification of triangles—an essential activity with respect to students’ understanding of geometric concepts. The aim of this study is to investigate if fifth grade students with LD ( n = 20) differ from students without LD ( n = 165) in the identification of triangles. We analyzed students’ error rates and use of strategies using eye tracking. We found that for representatives of triangles, students with LD used quick strategies, that is, strategies involving only few gazes, more often than students without LD and tended to make fewer errors. For non-representatives, however, we found that students with LD tended to use analytic strategies through attending to more parts of the shapes more often than students without LD but made more errors. The results indicate that students with LD differed from students without LD in the identification of triangles, and that students with LD not only have difficulties in mathematics, but also show certain strengths in geometry. However, the results also indicate that educators need to support students, especially with LD, in attending to critical attributes of triangles.

Mathematics Education Research Journal
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Cologne (DE)
Universität zu Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.