Mapping Medieval Marriage: Canon Law, Regionalism, and the Evolution of Legal History

This article revisits James Brundage's landmark 1975 study on medieval marriage as a starting point for tracing key developments in the historiography of marriage law over the past fifty years. Brundage's analysis of consent and marital affection in canon law laid the groundwork for a dynamic field that has since expanded in scope and method. Rather than providing a comprehensive overview, this article highlights three major shifts: debates over the influence of canon law ideals on marital practice; growing attention to regional variation in legal interpretation; and the impact of shifts in the field of legal history on the study of marriage. This article is part of a Special Issue marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Journal of Medieval History.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medieval History
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03044181.2025.2526834
Primary Topic
Historical Legal Studies and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Medieval Marriage: Canon Law, Regionalism, and the Evolution of Legal History

Chanelle Delameillieure
Journal of Medieval History
Historical Legal Studies and Society
article

Mapping Medieval Marriage: Canon Law, Regionalism, and the Evolution of Legal History

Chanelle Delameillieure
article en

Abstract

This article revisits James Brundage's landmark 1975 study on medieval marriage as a starting point for tracing key developments in the historiography of marriage law over the past fifty years. Brundage's analysis of consent and marital affection in canon law laid the groundwork for a dynamic field that has since expanded in scope and method. Rather than providing a comprehensive overview, this article highlights three major shifts: debates over the influence of canon law ideals on marital practice; growing attention to regional variation in legal interpretation; and the impact of shifts in the field of legal history on the study of marriage. This article is part of a Special Issue marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Journal of Medieval History.

Journal of Medieval HistoryVol. 51(4)
KU Leuven (BE)
KU Leuven
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Historical Legal Studies and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.