Flow transport and not ejection fraction determines blood stasis in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function

Impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a risk factor for intraventricular thrombosis and cardioembolism. However, below a given threshold, LV ejection fraction (EF) poorly predicts these events, suggesting the existence of additional sources of variability. We introduce queue models of LV blood transit connecting flow component analysis and residence time (RT) mapping. These models yield closed-form expressions for the average RT of blood in the LV as a function of (1) EF, (2) direct flow (DF), and (3) residual volume (RV). Models' performance was tested against RT obtained from vector flow mapping in 332 subjects, including controls and patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hypertrophic (HCM), and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Queue models show RT is increasingly sensitive to DF as EF decreases, contradicting the traditional view of large DF as a teleological advantage. Instead, RT is minimized when blood transits in a first-in-first-out (FIFO) manner, while DF short-circuits the FIFO pattern, prolonging RT for other flow components. FIFO models showed a good performance in assessing RT in the studied subjects. Our results show that large DFs increase blood stasis when EF is low. These models also explain why EF is a poor marker of the risk of intraventricular thrombosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Reports
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70351
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow transport and not ejection fraction determines blood stasis in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function

Juan C. del Álamo, Pablo Martínez‐Legazpi, Javier Bermejo
1 citations
Physiological Reports
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
1.39
article

Flow transport and not ejection fraction determines blood stasis in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function

Juan C. del Álamo, Pablo Martínez‐Legazpi, Javier Bermejo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a risk factor for intraventricular thrombosis and cardioembolism. However, below a given threshold, LV ejection fraction (EF) poorly predicts these events, suggesting the existence of additional sources of variability. We introduce queue models of LV blood transit connecting flow component analysis and residence time (RT) mapping. These models yield closed-form expressions for the average RT of blood in the LV as a function of (1) EF, (2) direct flow (DF), and (3) residual volume (RV). Models' performance was tested against RT obtained from vector flow mapping in 332 subjects, including controls and patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hypertrophic (HCM), and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Queue models show RT is increasingly sensitive to DF as EF decreases, contradicting the traditional view of large DF as a teleological advantage. Instead, RT is minimized when blood transits in a first-in-first-out (FIFO) manner, while DF short-circuits the FIFO pattern, prolonging RT for other flow components. FIFO models showed a good performance in assessing RT in the studied subjects. Our results show that large DFs increase blood stasis when EF is low. These models also explain why EF is a poor marker of the risk of intraventricular thrombosis.

Physiological ReportsVol. 13(13)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES), University of Washington (US), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Washington Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.