Introducing the FoRe-Squares Model: Focus Support and Reward as Key Predictors of Effective Technology-Augmented Instruction

Abstract Given the many opportunities for technology use in education nowadays (e.g., Large language models, explainer videos, digital quizzing), teachers should know and rely on evidence-based answers to questions about when, how, and why technology-augmented instruction helps or hinders learning. To date, finding these answers requires integrating theories and concepts from multiple research fields (e.g., multimedia learning, intelligent tutoring systems, gamification) and perspectives on learning (cognition, motivation), which makes evidence-based answers less likely to be found in practice. To address this problem, we drafted a simple model (i.e., FoRe-Squares model) that synthesizes evidence-based concepts from various research fields and both cognitive and motivational theory. The FoRe -Squares model predicts that technology-augmented instruction is effective only when it provides both Fo cus support (cognitive factor) and Re ward (motivational factor) to enable and motivate active goal-directed processing. Technology-augmented instruction is thus more effective when it does not just apply cognitive techniques (e.g., signaling, contiguity) to increase focus support, but also motivational techniques (e.g., choice, gamification) to increase reward. Furthermore, cognitive-motivational techniques (e.g., elaborative feedback, intrinsic integration) are most likely effective for learning because they increase both focus support and reward at the same time; they should be prioritized when only a few techniques can be applied. Since just the two factors of focus support and reward predict learning outcomes across a broad range of situations, the FoRe-Squares model aims to provide a simple but evidence-based guide to technology-augmented instruction that should help instructional practice and inspire further research including instruction without technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10045-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introducing the FoRe-Squares Model: Focus Support and Reward as Key Predictors of Effective Technology-Augmented Instruction

M. Krebs, Alexander Eitel, Claudia Schöne
2 citations
Educational Psychology Review
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
article

Introducing the FoRe-Squares Model: Focus Support and Reward as Key Predictors of Effective Technology-Augmented Instruction

M. Krebs, Alexander Eitel, Claudia Schöne
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Given the many opportunities for technology use in education nowadays (e.g., Large language models, explainer videos, digital quizzing), teachers should know and rely on evidence-based answers to questions about when, how, and why technology-augmented instruction helps or hinders learning. To date, finding these answers requires integrating theories and concepts from multiple research fields (e.g., multimedia learning, intelligent tutoring systems, gamification) and perspectives on learning (cognition, motivation), which makes evidence-based answers less likely to be found in practice. To address this problem, we drafted a simple model (i.e., FoRe-Squares model) that synthesizes evidence-based concepts from various research fields and both cognitive and motivational theory. The FoRe -Squares model predicts that technology-augmented instruction is effective only when it provides both Fo cus support (cognitive factor) and Re ward (motivational factor) to enable and motivate active goal-directed processing. Technology-augmented instruction is thus more effective when it does not just apply cognitive techniques (e.g., signaling, contiguity) to increase focus support, but also motivational techniques (e.g., choice, gamification) to increase reward. Furthermore, cognitive-motivational techniques (e.g., elaborative feedback, intrinsic integration) are most likely effective for learning because they increase both focus support and reward at the same time; they should be prioritized when only a few techniques can be applied. Since just the two factors of focus support and reward predict learning outcomes across a broad range of situations, the FoRe-Squares model aims to provide a simple but evidence-based guide to technology-augmented instruction that should help instructional practice and inspire further research including instruction without technology.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 37(3)
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Introducing the FoRe-Squares Model: Focus Support and Reward as Key Predictors of Effective Technology-Augmented Instruction — M. Krebs, Alexander Eitel, et al. · Educational Psychology Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS