Peeping at creAItivity through a keyhole: creative self-perceptions, potential, and enhancement of GenAI chatbots

Abstract The work in this paper investigates (a) the (emerging) creative self-perceptions of GenAI chatbots, (b) their creative potential, (c) their ability to self-assess the creativity of their own outcomes and that of their peers, and (d) how their creative outcomes can be improved. To this end, an exploratory study was implemented involving three popular commercial chatbots: ChatGPT (GPT-4o - paid) by OpenAI, Claude (3.5 Sonnet - paid) by Anthropic and Gemini (1.5 Flash - free) by Google. The study included four phases and employed well-established methods and tools from the scientific domain of (human) creativity research, including the Short Scale of Creative Self (SSCS) questionnaire, a verbal test of convergent-integrative thought from the Evaluation of Potential Creativity (EPoC) battery which was scored by the chatbots and human experts, and the Dynamic Assessment (DA) approach and humor as means for enhancing the chatbots’ creative outcomes. The results of the study are encapsulated in 21 original and, sometimes, surprising observations and in 6 practical insights regarding the use of GenAI chatbots as creativity-support tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11288-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peeping at creAItivity through a keyhole: creative self-perceptions, potential, and enhancement of GenAI chatbots

Dimitris Grammenos, Todd Lubart
2 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
4.24
article

Peeping at creAItivity through a keyhole: creative self-perceptions, potential, and enhancement of GenAI chatbots

Dimitris Grammenos, Todd Lubart
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The work in this paper investigates (a) the (emerging) creative self-perceptions of GenAI chatbots, (b) their creative potential, (c) their ability to self-assess the creativity of their own outcomes and that of their peers, and (d) how their creative outcomes can be improved. To this end, an exploratory study was implemented involving three popular commercial chatbots: ChatGPT (GPT-4o - paid) by OpenAI, Claude (3.5 Sonnet - paid) by Anthropic and Gemini (1.5 Flash - free) by Google. The study included four phases and employed well-established methods and tools from the scientific domain of (human) creativity research, including the Short Scale of Creative Self (SSCS) questionnaire, a verbal test of convergent-integrative thought from the Evaluation of Potential Creativity (EPoC) battery which was scored by the chatbots and human experts, and the Dynamic Assessment (DA) approach and humor as means for enhancing the chatbots’ creative outcomes. The results of the study are encapsulated in 21 original and, sometimes, surprising observations and in 6 practical insights regarding the use of GenAI chatbots as creativity-support tools.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 58(10)
Université Paris Cité (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Laboratoire de Psychologie et d’Ergonomie Appliquées (FR), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.