Exploring impacts of participatory science communication on science, politics, and society

Discussions on potential impacts of participatory science communication (PSC) formats on science, society, and politics would benefit from more empirical investigation. This article provides a systematic analysis of the perceptions of science communicators on the potential impacts of PSC on these different groups. The two basic questions are: What impact does PSC have on science, society, and politics? To what extent can these impacts be attributed to the different PSC communication formats? To answer these questions, 20 PSC projects implemented in the German Science Year 2022 were analysed. Semi-structured interviews with project coordinators revealed diverse potential impacts on science, society, and politics. While the impacts on science and society were predominantly assessed positively, impacts on politics were considered to be more case-specific and subordinate. Regression analyses indicate that these impacts can rarely be attributed to the PSC communication formats applied in projects. The results call into question global statements on the relevance of participation, and highlight the importance of different impact mechanisms for different groups in communication projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1566429
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring impacts of participatory science communication on science, politics, and society

Dieter Kirschke, Sabrina Kirschke, Jannis Glahe
Frontiers in Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Exploring impacts of participatory science communication on science, politics, and society

Dieter Kirschke, Sabrina Kirschke, Jannis Glahe
article en

Abstract

Discussions on potential impacts of participatory science communication (PSC) formats on science, society, and politics would benefit from more empirical investigation. This article provides a systematic analysis of the perceptions of science communicators on the potential impacts of PSC on these different groups. The two basic questions are: What impact does PSC have on science, society, and politics? To what extent can these impacts be attributed to the different PSC communication formats? To answer these questions, 20 PSC projects implemented in the German Science Year 2022 were analysed. Semi-structured interviews with project coordinators revealed diverse potential impacts on science, society, and politics. While the impacts on science and society were predominantly assessed positively, impacts on politics were considered to be more case-specific and subordinate. Regression analyses indicate that these impacts can rarely be attributed to the PSC communication formats applied in projects. The results call into question global statements on the relevance of participation, and highlight the importance of different impact mechanisms for different groups in communication projects.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
Museum für Naturkunde (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.