Minimum‐Peak‐Cost Flows Over Time

ABSTRACT Peak cost is a novel objective for flows over time that describes the amount of workforce necessary to run a system. We focus on minimizing peak costs in the context of maximum temporally repeated flows and formulate the corresponding MPC‐MTRF problem. First, we discuss the limitations that emerge when restricting the solution space to integral temporally repeated flows, which is motivated by practical applications. We show that, in general, MPC‐MTRF has an integrality gap of and an arbitrarily bad approximation ratio compared to general flows over time. We proceed with a complexity analysis for MPC‐MTRF and show that both the decision version and the optimization version of integral MPC‐MTRF are strongly ‐hard, even under strong restrictions. On the positive side, we identify two special cases that are solvable in polynomial time: unit‐cost series‐parallel networks and networks with time horizon at least twice as long as the longest path in the network with respect to the transit time. Moreover, in both cases, we provide an explicit algorithm that constructs an integral optimal solution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Networks
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/net.70001
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum‐Peak‐Cost Flows Over Time

Corinna Mathwieser, Emma Ahrens, Timo Gersing, Christina Büsing et al.
Networks
Traffic control and management
article

Minimum‐Peak‐Cost Flows Over Time

Corinna Mathwieser, Emma Ahrens, Timo Gersing, Christina Büsing, Sophia Wrede, Mariia Anapolska, Sabrina Schmitz, Felix Engelhardt
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Peak cost is a novel objective for flows over time that describes the amount of workforce necessary to run a system. We focus on minimizing peak costs in the context of maximum temporally repeated flows and formulate the corresponding MPC‐MTRF problem. First, we discuss the limitations that emerge when restricting the solution space to integral temporally repeated flows, which is motivated by practical applications. We show that, in general, MPC‐MTRF has an integrality gap of and an arbitrarily bad approximation ratio compared to general flows over time. We proceed with a complexity analysis for MPC‐MTRF and show that both the decision version and the optimization version of integral MPC‐MTRF are strongly ‐hard, even under strong restrictions. On the positive side, we identify two special cases that are solvable in polynomial time: unit‐cost series‐parallel networks and networks with time horizon at least twice as long as the longest path in the network with respect to the transit time. Moreover, in both cases, we provide an explicit algorithm that constructs an integral optimal solution.

NetworksVol. 86(4)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Traffic control and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.