A matter of time? How absence from work affects gender gaps in research productivity

Abstract Studies examining gender and research productivity generally show that men produce significantly more publications than women. While controlling for academic position and scientific field reduces the gender gap, some disparity remains. We examine the extent to which accounting for time away from work can further close the gap. Previous studies indicate that women take longer leaves of absence than men, particularly in their early career years, although research productivity metrics normally measure publications produced over a calendar year without adjusting for how much the researcher was working during the previous year. We adjust for the time lost due to parental leaves and sick leaves longer than 2 weeks to examine how the total length of time away from work within a year affects research productivity. Coupling the publication records of 17,000 Norwegian academics with data on their leaves of absence, gender, age, and academic position, we find that while academic field and position explain most of the gender gap in research output, absence also has a distinct contribution: A 2-week absence reduces fractionalized publications by 0.01 the following year, which corresponds to approximately 1% of the mean for men and 1.7% of the mean for women. Each additional day of absence reduces fractionalized publications by another 0.001. Adjusting for absence represents a small but important piece of the puzzle and provides more evidence for the assertion that the more similar the conditions under which men and women produce research, the more similar their output.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01481-5
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A matter of time? How absence from work affects gender gaps in research productivity

Lynn P. Nygaard, Rune Borgan Reiling, Dag W. Aksnes
Higher Education
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

A matter of time? How absence from work affects gender gaps in research productivity

Lynn P. Nygaard, Rune Borgan Reiling, Dag W. Aksnes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Studies examining gender and research productivity generally show that men produce significantly more publications than women. While controlling for academic position and scientific field reduces the gender gap, some disparity remains. We examine the extent to which accounting for time away from work can further close the gap. Previous studies indicate that women take longer leaves of absence than men, particularly in their early career years, although research productivity metrics normally measure publications produced over a calendar year without adjusting for how much the researcher was working during the previous year. We adjust for the time lost due to parental leaves and sick leaves longer than 2 weeks to examine how the total length of time away from work within a year affects research productivity. Coupling the publication records of 17,000 Norwegian academics with data on their leaves of absence, gender, age, and academic position, we find that while academic field and position explain most of the gender gap in research output, absence also has a distinct contribution: A 2-week absence reduces fractionalized publications by 0.01 the following year, which corresponds to approximately 1% of the mean for men and 1.7% of the mean for women. Each additional day of absence reduces fractionalized publications by another 0.001. Adjusting for absence represents a small but important piece of the puzzle and provides more evidence for the assertion that the more similar the conditions under which men and women produce research, the more similar their output.

Higher Education
Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NO), Peace Research Institute Oslo (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.