A Guide to Understanding Your Sage-Ruler

Abstract In recent years there has been an increase in scholarly discussion about the viability of Confucian political ideas in the contemporary world. Since the early 1990s, some researchers have proposed that there is an upper boundary to how many individuals a human being’s social network can contain. These limitations may threaten virtue-based political theories that rely on certain assumptions about the kinds and scope of human relationships. I argue that although Confucian views may initially seem vulnerable to this challenge, the Confucian sage-ruler need not worry about the limitations of one’s social network. I further argue that this problem can be overcome by using other contemporary empirical work on leadership influence, at least to some degree, while also potentially highlighting where the ultimate limits of the Confucian view might be. I aim to thereby also bring into focus organizational leadership literature that can enhance recent, empirically-informed discussions of Confucianism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dao
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-025-10000-3
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Guide to Understanding Your Sage-Ruler

Andrew R. Ruble
Dao
Cultural Differences and Values
article

A Guide to Understanding Your Sage-Ruler

Andrew R. Ruble
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent years there has been an increase in scholarly discussion about the viability of Confucian political ideas in the contemporary world. Since the early 1990s, some researchers have proposed that there is an upper boundary to how many individuals a human being’s social network can contain. These limitations may threaten virtue-based political theories that rely on certain assumptions about the kinds and scope of human relationships. I argue that although Confucian views may initially seem vulnerable to this challenge, the Confucian sage-ruler need not worry about the limitations of one’s social network. I further argue that this problem can be overcome by using other contemporary empirical work on leadership influence, at least to some degree, while also potentially highlighting where the ultimate limits of the Confucian view might be. I aim to thereby also bring into focus organizational leadership literature that can enhance recent, empirically-informed discussions of Confucianism.

DaoVol. 24(3)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Guide to Understanding Your Sage-Ruler — Andrew R. Ruble · Dao (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS