Private equity in healthcare: implications and policy recommendations

Private equity (PE) involvement in healthcare has generated considerable debate regarding its implications for patient care, healthcare quality, and system sustainability. While PE can inject much-needed capital into struggling healthcare facilities, its profit-driven motives and focus on short-term financial gains can lead to cost-cutting measures and business closures that jeopardize patient access and the quality of care. To maximize profits, PE firms may exploit legal and regulatory loopholes, engage in aggressive billing practices, and acquire healthcare providers to reduce competition through consolidation, driving up prices. Evidence suggests that there are both risks and benefits to PE involvement in healthcare, with some studies reporting increased costs and quality concerns, whereas others highlight improved operational efficiency and stabilization of at-risk providers. This commentary provides an overview of both sides and offers policy recommendations addressing some of the detrimental effects of PE practices on the healthcare sector, to ensure that patient well-being remains the priority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2025-0039
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Private equity in healthcare: implications and policy recommendations

Maxim Jestin
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Private equity in healthcare: implications and policy recommendations

Maxim Jestin
article en

Abstract

Private equity (PE) involvement in healthcare has generated considerable debate regarding its implications for patient care, healthcare quality, and system sustainability. While PE can inject much-needed capital into struggling healthcare facilities, its profit-driven motives and focus on short-term financial gains can lead to cost-cutting measures and business closures that jeopardize patient access and the quality of care. To maximize profits, PE firms may exploit legal and regulatory loopholes, engage in aggressive billing practices, and acquire healthcare providers to reduce competition through consolidation, driving up prices. Evidence suggests that there are both risks and benefits to PE involvement in healthcare, with some studies reporting increased costs and quality concerns, whereas others highlight improved operational efficiency and stabilization of at-risk providers. This commentary provides an overview of both sides and offers policy recommendations addressing some of the detrimental effects of PE practices on the healthcare sector, to ensure that patient well-being remains the priority.

Journal of Osteopathic MedicineVol. 126(1)
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.