Sviluppo Infrastrutturale e Politica Regionale nel Caucaso Meridionale. Azerbaigian e Georgia tra liminalità e rinnovata attorialità

This article examines the renewed strategic prominence of Azerbaijan and Georgia in the regional landscape reshaped by the Russia–Ukraine conflict and the reconfiguration of Eurasian infrastructural corridors. Drawing on the concept of liminality—understood in both geographic and ontological terms—the study explores how these two states have leveraged their “in-between” condition as a strategic asset. Through infrastructure diplomacy, they have sought to enhance their agency and reassert their sovereignty. The cases of the Port of Alat (Azerbaijan) and the Port of Anaklia (Georgia) illustrate the broader ambition of both countries to reposition themselves at the center of emerging connectivity networks and to negotiate political space among competing powers. Liminality is thus reinterpreted not as a source of vulnerability, but as an operative platform for the creative agency and for the development of new models of regional sovereignty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus.
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36253/asiac-3581
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sviluppo Infrastrutturale e Politica Regionale nel Caucaso Meridionale. Azerbaigian e Georgia tra liminalità e rinnovata attorialità

Carlo Frappi, Laura Mafizzoli
Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus.
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

Sviluppo Infrastrutturale e Politica Regionale nel Caucaso Meridionale. Azerbaigian e Georgia tra liminalità e rinnovata attorialità

Carlo Frappi, Laura Mafizzoli
article en

Abstract

This article examines the renewed strategic prominence of Azerbaijan and Georgia in the regional landscape reshaped by the Russia–Ukraine conflict and the reconfiguration of Eurasian infrastructural corridors. Drawing on the concept of liminality—understood in both geographic and ontological terms—the study explores how these two states have leveraged their “in-between” condition as a strategic asset. Through infrastructure diplomacy, they have sought to enhance their agency and reassert their sovereignty. The cases of the Port of Alat (Azerbaijan) and the Port of Anaklia (Georgia) illustrate the broader ambition of both countries to reposition themselves at the center of emerging connectivity networks and to negotiate political space among competing powers. Liminality is thus reinterpreted not as a source of vulnerability, but as an operative platform for the creative agency and for the development of new models of regional sovereignty.

Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus.
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sviluppo Infrastrutturale e Politica Regionale nel Caucaso Meridionale. Azerbaigian e Georgia tra liminalità e rinnovata attorialità — Carlo Frappi, Laura Mafizzoli · Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS