Lateral Asymmetries and Their Predictive Ability for Maximal Incremental Cycle Ergometer Performance in Road Cyclists

This study aimed to (1) determine and compare the magnitude and direction of asymmetry in lower limbs neuromuscular properties, range of motion, strength and muscle electrical activity (EMG) in well-trained male road cyclist across categories (elite, under-23 and junior); (2) establish test- and age-specific asymmetry thresholds for these variables to enable individualized classification; and (3) examine the relationship between these lateral asymmetries and performance in a maximal incremental cycle ergometer test. Fifty-five well-trained road cyclists were assessed through tensiomyography (TMG), active knee extension test (AKE), leg press and EMG of vastus lateralis (VL-EMG) during a maximal incremental cycling test. Junior cyclists showed lower asymmetry in VM than elite cyclists, but greater asymmetry in AKE. No significant differences were found in strength or VL-EMG during the maximal incremental cycle ergometer test. The magnitude and direction of lateral asymmetry differs between tests (TMG: 11.3–21.3%; AKE: 2.3%; leg-press: 9.8–31.9%; VL-EMG: 20.8–22.7%). Multiple linear regression revealed a significant predictive model for maximal incremental cycling ergometer performance based on lateral asymmetry in AKE, leg press and VL and rectus femoris contraction time (R2a = 0.23). These reference data can support trainers in monitoring and managing lateral asymmetry throughout the cyclists’ season.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17071060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lateral Asymmetries and Their Predictive Ability for Maximal Incremental Cycle Ergometer Performance in Road Cyclists

Tania Álvarez‐Yates, Alba Cuba‐Dorado, José A. López-Campos, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura et al.
1 citations
Symmetry
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Lateral Asymmetries and Their Predictive Ability for Maximal Incremental Cycle Ergometer Performance in Road Cyclists

Tania Álvarez‐Yates, Alba Cuba‐Dorado, José A. López-Campos, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Diego Fernández‐Redondo, Óscar García-García, Mario Iglesias‐Caamaño, Jose Manuel Abalo-Rey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) determine and compare the magnitude and direction of asymmetry in lower limbs neuromuscular properties, range of motion, strength and muscle electrical activity (EMG) in well-trained male road cyclist across categories (elite, under-23 and junior); (2) establish test- and age-specific asymmetry thresholds for these variables to enable individualized classification; and (3) examine the relationship between these lateral asymmetries and performance in a maximal incremental cycle ergometer test. Fifty-five well-trained road cyclists were assessed through tensiomyography (TMG), active knee extension test (AKE), leg press and EMG of vastus lateralis (VL-EMG) during a maximal incremental cycling test. Junior cyclists showed lower asymmetry in VM than elite cyclists, but greater asymmetry in AKE. No significant differences were found in strength or VL-EMG during the maximal incremental cycle ergometer test. The magnitude and direction of lateral asymmetry differs between tests (TMG: 11.3–21.3%; AKE: 2.3%; leg-press: 9.8–31.9%; VL-EMG: 20.8–22.7%). Multiple linear regression revealed a significant predictive model for maximal incremental cycling ergometer performance based on lateral asymmetry in AKE, leg press and VL and rectus femoris contraction time (R2a = 0.23). These reference data can support trainers in monitoring and managing lateral asymmetry throughout the cyclists’ season.

SymmetryVol. 17(7)
Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra (ES), Instituto Superior da Maia (PT), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.