Preoperative predictive thresholds for successful canaloplasty in glaucoma patients

In patients with preoperative IOPs of ≤ 36.9 mmHg or 27.1 mmHg, canaloplasty is likely to be an effective and safe procedure to obtain target pressures ≤ 18 mmHg with or without IOP-lowering eye drops, respectively. These data suggest that preoperative thresholds could help predict postoperative outcomes and improve patient selection for glaucoma surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06887-6
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative predictive thresholds for successful canaloplasty in glaucoma patients

Karl Mercieca, Matthias Fuest, Julia Prinz, David Kuerten et al.
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Preoperative predictive thresholds for successful canaloplasty in glaucoma patients

Karl Mercieca, Matthias Fuest, Julia Prinz, David Kuerten, Peter Walter, Claus Cursiefen, Verena Prokosch, Carla-Maria Epping
article en

Abstract

In patients with preoperative IOPs of ≤ 36.9 mmHg or 27.1 mmHg, canaloplasty is likely to be an effective and safe procedure to obtain target pressures ≤ 18 mmHg with or without IOP-lowering eye drops, respectively. These data suggest that preoperative thresholds could help predict postoperative outcomes and improve patient selection for glaucoma surgery.

Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental OphthalmologyVol. 263(10)
University Hospital Bonn (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.