Keabsahan Perjanjian Lisan Menurut Hukum Perdata di Indonesia

In everyday life, the practice of making agreements is often done simply without written form, especially in social interactions and informal economic activities. This raises legal questions about whether agreements made orally have valid legal force. This study aims to understand the legal position of oral agreements from the perspective of Indonesian civil law, especially regarding the requirements for the validity of an agreement based on the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). This study uses a normative juridical method, with an approach to laws and legal doctrine. The results of the study show that even though they are not made in writing, oral agreements are still valid as long as they meet the applicable legal requirements. However, the problem that often arises lies in the difficulty of proof when peace occurs. Therefore, it is important for parties to consider written records as a form of legal protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politika Progresif Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Humaniora
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i2.1583
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keabsahan Perjanjian Lisan Menurut Hukum Perdata di Indonesia

Bella Putri Sakinah
Politika Progresif Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Humaniora
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Keabsahan Perjanjian Lisan Menurut Hukum Perdata di Indonesia

Bella Putri Sakinah
article en

Abstract

In everyday life, the practice of making agreements is often done simply without written form, especially in social interactions and informal economic activities. This raises legal questions about whether agreements made orally have valid legal force. This study aims to understand the legal position of oral agreements from the perspective of Indonesian civil law, especially regarding the requirements for the validity of an agreement based on the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). This study uses a normative juridical method, with an approach to laws and legal doctrine. The results of the study show that even though they are not made in writing, oral agreements are still valid as long as they meet the applicable legal requirements. However, the problem that often arises lies in the difficulty of proof when peace occurs. Therefore, it is important for parties to consider written records as a form of legal protection.

Politika Progresif Jurnal Hukum Politik dan HumanioraVol. 2(2)
Islamic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Keabsahan Perjanjian Lisan Menurut Hukum Perdata di Indonesia — Bella Putri Sakinah · Politika Progresif Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Humaniora (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS