Why is it so Hard to Counteract Wealth Inequality? Evidence from the United Kingdom

abstract: Despite high and rising levels of wealth inequality, many advanced democracies have cut taxes on inherited wealth in recent decades. To explain this puzzle, the authors argue that taxing inherited wealth is politically difficult because, paradoxically, the people who have the strongest material interest in higher taxes—low-wealth renters—are those least likely to express a clear opinion about inheritance taxation. Instead, the political terrain is shaped by the preferences of homeowners and their children, who have a strong material interest in lower inheritance taxes. Empirically, the authors first evaluate this argument using original survey data from the United Kingdom. In two survey experiments, they next examine how exposure to information influences views on inheritance taxation. While the authors find no effect of providing statistical information about the distribution of housing wealth, preferences are influenced by explanatory information that explicitly outlines the potential effects of inheritance taxation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Politics
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2025.a964464
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why is it so Hard to Counteract Wealth Inequality? Evidence from the United Kingdom

Jacob Nyrup, Ben W. Ansell, Laure Bokobza, Asli Cansunar et al.
4 citations
World Politics
Social Policy and Reform Studies
25.57
article

Why is it so Hard to Counteract Wealth Inequality? Evidence from the United Kingdom

Jacob Nyrup, Ben W. Ansell, Laure Bokobza, Asli Cansunar, Matthias Haslberger, Mads Andreas Elkjær
article en
4 citations

Abstract

abstract: Despite high and rising levels of wealth inequality, many advanced democracies have cut taxes on inherited wealth in recent decades. To explain this puzzle, the authors argue that taxing inherited wealth is politically difficult because, paradoxically, the people who have the strongest material interest in higher taxes—low-wealth renters—are those least likely to express a clear opinion about inheritance taxation. Instead, the political terrain is shaped by the preferences of homeowners and their children, who have a strong material interest in lower inheritance taxes. Empirically, the authors first evaluate this argument using original survey data from the United Kingdom. In two survey experiments, they next examine how exposure to information influences views on inheritance taxation. While the authors find no effect of providing statistical information about the distribution of housing wealth, preferences are influenced by explanatory information that explicitly outlines the potential effects of inheritance taxation.

World PoliticsVol. 77(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why is it so Hard to Counteract Wealth Inequality? Evidence from the United Kingdom — Jacob Nyrup, Ben W. Ansell, et al. · World Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS