Trade-Offs of Social Democratic Party Strategies in a Pluralized Issue Space: A Conjoint Analysis

abstract: This article provides a novel framework and empirical test of the strategic trade-offs of political parties’ programmatic appeals. In a pluralized issue space, political positions have the potential to create severe strategic trade-offs for political parties, with gains among one group of voters offset by losses among another. Existing research assumes that these trade-offs are especially prominent for social democratic parties but does not directly test whether specific subelectorates respond differently to particular programmatic appeals. To identify trade-offs for social democratic parties, the authors ran conjoint experiments in six Western European countries. Respondents could choose between programs that varied on several issue dimensions. The authors find that trade-offs among potential social democratic voters are less pronounced than the literature expects, especially regarding economic policies. The findings also establish two underrated challenges for social democratic parties: the existence of stronger trade-offs between age groups and the potential longer-term consequences of salience trade-offs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Politics
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2025.a964462
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
76.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade-Offs of Social Democratic Party Strategies in a Pluralized Issue Space: A Conjoint Analysis

Reto Mitteregger, Markus Wagner, Nadja Mosimann, Silja Häusermann et al.
9 citations
World Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
76.70
article

Trade-Offs of Social Democratic Party Strategies in a Pluralized Issue Space: A Conjoint Analysis

Reto Mitteregger, Markus Wagner, Nadja Mosimann, Silja Häusermann, Tarik Abou‐Chadi
article en
9 citations

Abstract

abstract: This article provides a novel framework and empirical test of the strategic trade-offs of political parties’ programmatic appeals. In a pluralized issue space, political positions have the potential to create severe strategic trade-offs for political parties, with gains among one group of voters offset by losses among another. Existing research assumes that these trade-offs are especially prominent for social democratic parties but does not directly test whether specific subelectorates respond differently to particular programmatic appeals. To identify trade-offs for social democratic parties, the authors ran conjoint experiments in six Western European countries. Respondents could choose between programs that varied on several issue dimensions. The authors find that trade-offs among potential social democratic voters are less pronounced than the literature expects, especially regarding economic policies. The findings also establish two underrated challenges for social democratic parties: the existence of stronger trade-offs between age groups and the potential longer-term consequences of salience trade-offs.

World PoliticsVol. 77(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
76.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.