Analiza gibalnega razvoja trojčkov

The purpose of this research was to analyze physical and motor development of triplets during primary school. We hypothesized that the physical and motor development of triplets would be below the level of their peers, but that the differences would have decreased by the end of primary school. 45 triplets (15 groups of triplets) participated in the research. With their permission, the data on physical and motor development was obtained from the SLOfit school databases. The results of 11 measurement tasks were analyzed. Eight assessed children’s motor abilities and three assessed their physical characteristics. Using this type of longitudinal data, enabled the comparison of individuals over the same period of childhood and adolescence and compare them to population data. The study showed that, on average, the triplets’ scores were not significantly below the national average. However, some statistically sig­nificant differences did occur. At the start of primary school, triplets were ranking below the national average in physical development (they were shorter, lighter and had less subcutaneous fat) and in two of the eight motor tests (600m run and stand and reach). At the end of primary school, they remained below the national average in physical development, however, the differences had decreased significantly. At the end of primary school, the triplets performed below the national average in three motor tests (600m run, 60m dash and backwards obstacle course). They performed above the national average in three motor tests (20-s hand tapping, 60-s sit-ups and bent arm hang). In two tasks (standing long jump and stand and reach), their results were not significantly different from the national average.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Šport revija za teoretična in praktična vprašanja športa
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52165/sport.73.1-2.161-167
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analiza gibalnega razvoja trojčkov

Gregor Starc, Mateja Videmšek, Barbara Tekavec Štular
Šport revija za teoretična in praktična vprašanja športa
Regional Development and Management Studies
article

Analiza gibalnega razvoja trojčkov

Gregor Starc, Mateja Videmšek, Barbara Tekavec Štular
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to analyze physical and motor development of triplets during primary school. We hypothesized that the physical and motor development of triplets would be below the level of their peers, but that the differences would have decreased by the end of primary school. 45 triplets (15 groups of triplets) participated in the research. With their permission, the data on physical and motor development was obtained from the SLOfit school databases. The results of 11 measurement tasks were analyzed. Eight assessed children’s motor abilities and three assessed their physical characteristics. Using this type of longitudinal data, enabled the comparison of individuals over the same period of childhood and adolescence and compare them to population data. The study showed that, on average, the triplets’ scores were not significantly below the national average. However, some statistically sig­nificant differences did occur. At the start of primary school, triplets were ranking below the national average in physical development (they were shorter, lighter and had less subcutaneous fat) and in two of the eight motor tests (600m run and stand and reach). At the end of primary school, they remained below the national average in physical development, however, the differences had decreased significantly. At the end of primary school, the triplets performed below the national average in three motor tests (600m run, 60m dash and backwards obstacle course). They performed above the national average in three motor tests (20-s hand tapping, 60-s sit-ups and bent arm hang). In two tasks (standing long jump and stand and reach), their results were not significantly different from the national average.

Šport revija za teoretična in praktična vprašanja športaVol. 73(1-2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Regional Development and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.