3142 Development of tools and criteria to select and prioritise candidate interventions for early-phase sarcopenia clinical trials

Abstract Background Recent advances in skeletal muscle biology have identified multiple potential candidate therapeutic interventions for sarcopenia. A systematic approach is needed to prioritise the most promising interventions for early-phase clinical studies. Methods A multidisciplinary team with expertise in sarcopenia, early-phase clinical trials, and geriatric medicine sought to identify target product profile (TPP) and intervention selection tools for neuromuscular conditions. As none were identified for sarcopenia, the group then developed a sarcopenia TPP. An algorithm was created to select interventions most suitable for early-phase trials, combining ‘stop/go’ criteria and traffic-light ratings. The tool was tested by evaluating outputs from a recent horizon scan and was adapted iteratively based on the findings. Results Key characteristics of an effective intervention for sarcopenia, as outlined by the Therapeutic Product Profile (TPP), include: The selection algorithm starts with two questions: ‘Is the drug contraindicated for older adults?’ and ‘Is there already a Phase 2/3 clinical trial evaluating this or similar agents for sarcopenia?’ The assessment considers evidence strength, mechanism of action, effective dose, safety in older adults, administration route and frequency, side effects, patent status, and availability. Examples of interventions include Alverine citrate (deprioritised as it is contraindicated in older adults), melatonin (prioritised for its safety and plausible mechanism), and angiotensin-receptor blockers (deprioritised due to previous Phase II testing). Conclusions The TPP and intervention selection tool show promise in enabling systematic evaluation of candidate sarcopenia interventions. They will now be used to select and prioritise interventions for future trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf133.114
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3142 Development of tools and criteria to select and prioritise candidate interventions for early-phase sarcopenia clinical trials

Miles D. Witham, Claire McDonald, R Polyma
Age and Ageing
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

3142 Development of tools and criteria to select and prioritise candidate interventions for early-phase sarcopenia clinical trials

Miles D. Witham, Claire McDonald, R Polyma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent advances in skeletal muscle biology have identified multiple potential candidate therapeutic interventions for sarcopenia. A systematic approach is needed to prioritise the most promising interventions for early-phase clinical studies. Methods A multidisciplinary team with expertise in sarcopenia, early-phase clinical trials, and geriatric medicine sought to identify target product profile (TPP) and intervention selection tools for neuromuscular conditions. As none were identified for sarcopenia, the group then developed a sarcopenia TPP. An algorithm was created to select interventions most suitable for early-phase trials, combining ‘stop/go’ criteria and traffic-light ratings. The tool was tested by evaluating outputs from a recent horizon scan and was adapted iteratively based on the findings. Results Key characteristics of an effective intervention for sarcopenia, as outlined by the Therapeutic Product Profile (TPP), include: The selection algorithm starts with two questions: ‘Is the drug contraindicated for older adults?’ and ‘Is there already a Phase 2/3 clinical trial evaluating this or similar agents for sarcopenia?’ The assessment considers evidence strength, mechanism of action, effective dose, safety in older adults, administration route and frequency, side effects, patent status, and availability. Examples of interventions include Alverine citrate (deprioritised as it is contraindicated in older adults), melatonin (prioritised for its safety and plausible mechanism), and angiotensin-receptor blockers (deprioritised due to previous Phase II testing). Conclusions The TPP and intervention selection tool show promise in enabling systematic evaluation of candidate sarcopenia interventions. They will now be used to select and prioritise interventions for future trials.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_2)
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Clinical Research Institute (US), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Sunderland (GB), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.