3159 Improving multidisciplinary team working: a multipronged quality improvement project in a tertiary care university hospital

Abstract Introduction In geriatric medicine department of a large tertiary care university hospital, it was observed that multidisciplinary team (MDT) working was not standardised, morning huddles were inefficient, there was a lack of inclusion of all members in MDT meetings and the meetings were too medical focused. The aim of this project was to address these concerns through a multipronged approach. Methods An initial survey was carried out with 34 participants from all disciplines of MDT. Areas needing improvement were identified from the survey and through discussions among doctors, nurses and therapists. A pilot of changes was introduced in the largest ward of the department. A post change survey was carried out, demonstrating improvement across multiple domains. Result Changes implemented: Post change survey showed: These findings were presented and shared in departmental monthly meeting. Conclusion The true essence of MDT working lies in all professions coming together to achieve patient-centred care. This can only be achieved if all professions understand and respect each other’s role and responsibilities. Through best practices, we can achieve more holistic care and prevent harm. It results in resources being used more efficiently through reduced duplication, greater productivity and preventative care approaches. Through a series of changes we demonstrated these in one ward and plan to replicate and implement these changes across the whole department.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf133.047
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3159 Improving multidisciplinary team working: a multipronged quality improvement project in a tertiary care university hospital

John Holmes, Phillip L.R. Nicolson, Usama S. Hamdan, S Fream
Age and Ageing
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

3159 Improving multidisciplinary team working: a multipronged quality improvement project in a tertiary care university hospital

John Holmes, Phillip L.R. Nicolson, Usama S. Hamdan, S Fream
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction In geriatric medicine department of a large tertiary care university hospital, it was observed that multidisciplinary team (MDT) working was not standardised, morning huddles were inefficient, there was a lack of inclusion of all members in MDT meetings and the meetings were too medical focused. The aim of this project was to address these concerns through a multipronged approach. Methods An initial survey was carried out with 34 participants from all disciplines of MDT. Areas needing improvement were identified from the survey and through discussions among doctors, nurses and therapists. A pilot of changes was introduced in the largest ward of the department. A post change survey was carried out, demonstrating improvement across multiple domains. Result Changes implemented: Post change survey showed: These findings were presented and shared in departmental monthly meeting. Conclusion The true essence of MDT working lies in all professions coming together to achieve patient-centred care. This can only be achieved if all professions understand and respect each other’s role and responsibilities. Through best practices, we can achieve more holistic care and prevent harm. It results in resources being used more efficiently through reduced duplication, greater productivity and preventative care approaches. Through a series of changes we demonstrated these in one ward and plan to replicate and implement these changes across the whole department.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_2)
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.