3067 Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: prescribing and deprescribing in frailty patients

Abstract Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is commonly administered to patients across many hospital settings; however, it can be more challenging to address in frailty patients. These patients are more likely to have contraindications to anticoagulation and be ‘delayed discharges’ (medically fit for discharge and at baseline mobility), at which point VTE prophylaxis may not be indicated. Method This quality improvement project was carried out in the acute geriatric ward at St John’s Hospital. With the aim to improve VTE prophylaxis (appropriately prescribed and deprescribed when delayed discharge) in frailty inpatients by December 2024, through education of medical staff and by creating a Trak proforma. Teaching was provided to ward medical staff and a new delayed discharge Trak proforma was created. This prompted a review of VTE prophylaxis deprescribing when patients were medically fit for discharge. A simultaneous QI project created an admissions proforma which prompted a review of VTE prophylaxis prescribing when a patient was first admitted to the ward. Results Before the intervention, only 58% of patients in Ward 8 had VTE prophylaxis correctly prescribed on admission. Many patients (40%) remained on VTE prophylaxis despite being delayed discharges. A staff survey revealed a higher confidence level around prescribing VTE prophylaxis than deprescribing. Only 44% of staff regularly considered stopping VTE prophylaxis once a patient was a delayed discharge. After the intervention, an increased number of patients (74%) had correct VTE prescriptions on Ward 8 admission (28% improvement). Only 16% of delayed discharge patients remained on VTE prophylaxis (60% improvement). Conclusion This project improved rates of VTE prescribing in patients admitted to an acute frailty ward and deprescription rates in patients where VTE prophylaxis was no longer indicated by prompting regular reviews of these prescriptions. This intervention could be utilised in other departments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf133.044
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3067 Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: prescribing and deprescribing in frailty patients

Ken D. Stark, A Degnan, Martin J. Kelly
Age and Ageing
Healthcare Systems and Practices
article

3067 Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: prescribing and deprescribing in frailty patients

Ken D. Stark, A Degnan, Martin J. Kelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is commonly administered to patients across many hospital settings; however, it can be more challenging to address in frailty patients. These patients are more likely to have contraindications to anticoagulation and be ‘delayed discharges’ (medically fit for discharge and at baseline mobility), at which point VTE prophylaxis may not be indicated. Method This quality improvement project was carried out in the acute geriatric ward at St John’s Hospital. With the aim to improve VTE prophylaxis (appropriately prescribed and deprescribed when delayed discharge) in frailty inpatients by December 2024, through education of medical staff and by creating a Trak proforma. Teaching was provided to ward medical staff and a new delayed discharge Trak proforma was created. This prompted a review of VTE prophylaxis deprescribing when patients were medically fit for discharge. A simultaneous QI project created an admissions proforma which prompted a review of VTE prophylaxis prescribing when a patient was first admitted to the ward. Results Before the intervention, only 58% of patients in Ward 8 had VTE prophylaxis correctly prescribed on admission. Many patients (40%) remained on VTE prophylaxis despite being delayed discharges. A staff survey revealed a higher confidence level around prescribing VTE prophylaxis than deprescribing. Only 44% of staff regularly considered stopping VTE prophylaxis once a patient was a delayed discharge. After the intervention, an increased number of patients (74%) had correct VTE prescriptions on Ward 8 admission (28% improvement). Only 16% of delayed discharge patients remained on VTE prophylaxis (60% improvement). Conclusion This project improved rates of VTE prescribing in patients admitted to an acute frailty ward and deprescription rates in patients where VTE prophylaxis was no longer indicated by prompting regular reviews of these prescriptions. This intervention could be utilised in other departments.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_2)
NHS Lothian (GB), Albyn Hospital (GB), St John's Hospital (GB), St. Johns Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Healthcare Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.