MANAGERIAL APPROACH TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A FACTOR FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT IN RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS

Objective of the study. Analysis of the possibilities of introducing the elements of a managerial approach to managing internal and external social responsibility as a factor in increasing the efficiency of Russian scientific institutions. Methodological basis of the study includes a comparative analysis of the workshop (“mastery”) and managerial approaches to management, a systems approach to social responsibility (internal and external), and a critical analysis of the organizational practices of scientific institutions. The basis is the concept of advanced commitments and social reporting, considered as tools for increasing efficiency, which allows us to propose a balanced model that combines the professional autonomy of the scientific community with the elements of modern management practices. Results of the study. The key features of shop management (“masterism”) in scientific institutions are identified, including its resistance to change, closed professional community and weak receptivity to management innovations. It is substantiated that the traditional approach to the management of scientific organizations limits their potential due to: lack of systemic interaction with the external environment; insufficient focus on the commercialization of scientific results; weak adaptation to the needs of society and the market. The authors prove that the introduction of elements of the managerial approach (systemic management of social responsibility, advanced obligations to employees and external stakeholders, public reporting) can improve the efficiency of management in scientific institutions. Recommendations for the integration of managerial principles into the management of scientific organizations without a radical rejection of traditional approaches are developed. Prospects of the study. Further research may be aimed at: Empirical verification of the proposed models of social responsibility management in specific scientific institutions. Development of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of implementing managerial approaches in non-profit scientific organizations. The study of barriers to organizational change in the scientific environment and ways to overcome them. Comparative studies of international management experience in scientific institutions to identify the best practices applicable to Russian conditions. Thus, the study opens up new directions for scientific discussion about the modernization of management in scientific organizations in terms of global management trends.  

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
HUMANITIES OF THE SOUTH OF RUSSIA
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2025.3.17
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MANAGERIAL APPROACH TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A FACTOR FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT IN RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS

Anzhela M. Salogub, Marina Arselgova
HUMANITIES OF THE SOUTH OF RUSSIA
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

MANAGERIAL APPROACH TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A FACTOR FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT IN RUSSIAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS

Anzhela M. Salogub, Marina Arselgova
article en

Abstract

Objective of the study. Analysis of the possibilities of introducing the elements of a managerial approach to managing internal and external social responsibility as a factor in increasing the efficiency of Russian scientific institutions. Methodological basis of the study includes a comparative analysis of the workshop (“mastery”) and managerial approaches to management, a systems approach to social responsibility (internal and external), and a critical analysis of the organizational practices of scientific institutions. The basis is the concept of advanced commitments and social reporting, considered as tools for increasing efficiency, which allows us to propose a balanced model that combines the professional autonomy of the scientific community with the elements of modern management practices. Results of the study. The key features of shop management (“masterism”) in scientific institutions are identified, including its resistance to change, closed professional community and weak receptivity to management innovations. It is substantiated that the traditional approach to the management of scientific organizations limits their potential due to: lack of systemic interaction with the external environment; insufficient focus on the commercialization of scientific results; weak adaptation to the needs of society and the market. The authors prove that the introduction of elements of the managerial approach (systemic management of social responsibility, advanced obligations to employees and external stakeholders, public reporting) can improve the efficiency of management in scientific institutions. Recommendations for the integration of managerial principles into the management of scientific organizations without a radical rejection of traditional approaches are developed. Prospects of the study. Further research may be aimed at: Empirical verification of the proposed models of social responsibility management in specific scientific institutions. Development of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of implementing managerial approaches in non-profit scientific organizations. The study of barriers to organizational change in the scientific environment and ways to overcome them. Comparative studies of international management experience in scientific institutions to identify the best practices applicable to Russian conditions. Thus, the study opens up new directions for scientific discussion about the modernization of management in scientific organizations in terms of global management trends.  

HUMANITIES OF THE SOUTH OF RUSSIAVol. 14(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.