Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolisation vs Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with BCLC Intermediate Stage of Hepatocellular Carcinoma; a short term follow up study

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 3rd leading etiology of cancer-related mortality worldwide and the 6th most prevalent tumor overall. Aim: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) in treating unresectable liver carcinoma. Patients and methods: This prospective investigation involved 75 cases with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma managed with conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Group I (n=42) or Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in Group II (n=33) at the National Cancer Institute in Cairo from 2019 to 2023. Results: Both groups showed comparable clinical parameters. Group I’s tumor load ranged from 2.1 to 8.3 cm (mean: 4.18 cm, SD: 1.93) and AFP levels from 304.4 to 1760.3 (mean: 1157.75, SD: 344.8), while Group II had a tumor load from 2 to 9.1 cm (mean: 4.48 cm, SD: 2.04) and AFP levels from 118.3 to 2582.6 (mean: 1280, SD: 573), with no significant distinctions (P=0.5169 and P=0.2552, correspondingly). Treatment responses were also similar, with both groups showing nearly identical distributions of complete, partial, stable, and progressive disease (P=0.998). However, regarding adverse effects, nausea and abdominal pain were significantly more frequent (P=0.0126 and P=0.0282, correspondingly), while vomiting rates remained comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Both procedures, cTACE and DEB-TACE, are efficient in the management of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma with no statistically significant superiority of DEB-TACE. Fewer complications are noticeable with cTACE in comparison with DEB-TACE.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64252/a2bvek82
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolisation vs Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with BCLC Intermediate Stage of Hepatocellular Carcinoma; a short term follow up study

Ahmed Mohamed Rozeka Abuelatta, Mohamed Elsayed Gadelmola, Amr Farouk Ibrahim, Reda Tabashy
International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolisation vs Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with BCLC Intermediate Stage of Hepatocellular Carcinoma; a short term follow up study

Ahmed Mohamed Rozeka Abuelatta, Mohamed Elsayed Gadelmola, Amr Farouk Ibrahim, Reda Tabashy
article en

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 3rd leading etiology of cancer-related mortality worldwide and the 6th most prevalent tumor overall. Aim: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) in treating unresectable liver carcinoma. Patients and methods: This prospective investigation involved 75 cases with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma managed with conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Group I (n=42) or Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in Group II (n=33) at the National Cancer Institute in Cairo from 2019 to 2023. Results: Both groups showed comparable clinical parameters. Group I’s tumor load ranged from 2.1 to 8.3 cm (mean: 4.18 cm, SD: 1.93) and AFP levels from 304.4 to 1760.3 (mean: 1157.75, SD: 344.8), while Group II had a tumor load from 2 to 9.1 cm (mean: 4.48 cm, SD: 2.04) and AFP levels from 118.3 to 2582.6 (mean: 1280, SD: 573), with no significant distinctions (P=0.5169 and P=0.2552, correspondingly). Treatment responses were also similar, with both groups showing nearly identical distributions of complete, partial, stable, and progressive disease (P=0.998). However, regarding adverse effects, nausea and abdominal pain were significantly more frequent (P=0.0126 and P=0.0282, correspondingly), while vomiting rates remained comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Both procedures, cTACE and DEB-TACE, are efficient in the management of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma with no statistically significant superiority of DEB-TACE. Fewer complications are noticeable with cTACE in comparison with DEB-TACE.

International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.