Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of two different luting cements (Zinc phosphate and Zinc polycarboxylate) used in dentistry

Background: This study was conducted for comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of two different luting cements (Zinc phosphate and Zinc polycarboxylate) used in dentistry. Materials & methods: In the present study, one hundred freshly extracted maxillary first premolars were employed. The samples were meticulously cleaned and preserved in sterile saline for future use. Upon completion of the cavity preparation, castings made of type IV dental stones were placed into each specimen. Wax patterns were utilized for the casting process. Subsequently, the castings underwent polishing, devesting, and finalization. The specimens were categorized into two research groups as follows: Group A consisted of teeth treated with zinc phosphate, while Group B comprised of teeth treated with zinc polycarboxylate. The mean tensile strength was determined using a universal testing apparatus. All results were analyzed using SPSS software and subsequently compiled into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. A student t test was conducted to assess the level of significance. Results: In group A, there were 50 teeth treated with zinc phosphate and in Group B, there were 50 teeth treated with zinc polycarboxylate cement. The samples from Group A and Group B exhibited mean tensile strengths of 4.52 MPa and 3.56 MPa, respectively. Notable results emerged from the statistical analysis comparing the mean tensile strengths of groups A and B. Conclusion: It has been determined that the average tensile strength of Zinc phosphate cement significantly exceeds that of Zinc polycarboxylate cement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64252/ff2gk072
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of two different luting cements (Zinc phosphate and Zinc polycarboxylate) used in dentistry

Rupali Baban Wetam, Dr.Shweta Gangavane, Shradha Gavade
International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of two different luting cements (Zinc phosphate and Zinc polycarboxylate) used in dentistry

Rupali Baban Wetam, Dr.Shweta Gangavane, Shradha Gavade
article en

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted for comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of two different luting cements (Zinc phosphate and Zinc polycarboxylate) used in dentistry. Materials & methods: In the present study, one hundred freshly extracted maxillary first premolars were employed. The samples were meticulously cleaned and preserved in sterile saline for future use. Upon completion of the cavity preparation, castings made of type IV dental stones were placed into each specimen. Wax patterns were utilized for the casting process. Subsequently, the castings underwent polishing, devesting, and finalization. The specimens were categorized into two research groups as follows: Group A consisted of teeth treated with zinc phosphate, while Group B comprised of teeth treated with zinc polycarboxylate. The mean tensile strength was determined using a universal testing apparatus. All results were analyzed using SPSS software and subsequently compiled into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. A student t test was conducted to assess the level of significance. Results: In group A, there were 50 teeth treated with zinc phosphate and in Group B, there were 50 teeth treated with zinc polycarboxylate cement. The samples from Group A and Group B exhibited mean tensile strengths of 4.52 MPa and 3.56 MPa, respectively. Notable results emerged from the statistical analysis comparing the mean tensile strengths of groups A and B. Conclusion: It has been determined that the average tensile strength of Zinc phosphate cement significantly exceeds that of Zinc polycarboxylate cement.

International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of two different luting cements (Zinc phosphate and Zinc polycarboxylate) used in dentistry — Rupali Baban Wetam, Dr.Shweta Gangavane, et al. · International Journal of Environmental Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS