Comparative Analysis Of Hammer Test And Compression Testing Machine Against Normal Concrete Compressive Strength Test K300

The materials used in a concrete construction have a major impact on its strength. But a lot of other things also matter, like the cement-water ratio (FAS), temperature fluctuations, curing conditions, and lack of compaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the findings of compressive strength testing of K-300 quality concrete using two different approaches: the non-destructive Hammer Test (HT) and the destructive Compression Test Machine (CTM). Both techniques were used to examine ten cube-shaped concrete samples that were 15 cm x 15 cm x 15 cm. The two approaches differed significantly, according to the results. Compressive strength values ??from CTM were consistently higher than those from HT. Test specimen number 7 showed that CTM had the highest compressive strength at 507.92 kg/cm², while test specimen number 10 showed that HT had the highest compressive strength at 247kg/cm². These findings suggest that in order to get more accurate results, CTM should be used in concrete testing

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL CENDEKIA (JTSC)
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51988/jtsc.v6i1.269
Primary Topic
Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis Of Hammer Test And Compression Testing Machine Against Normal Concrete Compressive Strength Test K300

Retnowati Setioningsih, Marwanto Marwanto, Vicky Putra Anugrah Pratama
1 links
JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL CENDEKIA (JTSC)
Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
article

Comparative Analysis Of Hammer Test And Compression Testing Machine Against Normal Concrete Compressive Strength Test K300

Retnowati Setioningsih, Marwanto Marwanto, Vicky Putra Anugrah Pratama
article en

Abstract

The materials used in a concrete construction have a major impact on its strength. But a lot of other things also matter, like the cement-water ratio (FAS), temperature fluctuations, curing conditions, and lack of compaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the findings of compressive strength testing of K-300 quality concrete using two different approaches: the non-destructive Hammer Test (HT) and the destructive Compression Test Machine (CTM). Both techniques were used to examine ten cube-shaped concrete samples that were 15 cm x 15 cm x 15 cm. The two approaches differed significantly, according to the results. Compressive strength values ??from CTM were consistently higher than those from HT. Test specimen number 7 showed that CTM had the highest compressive strength at 507.92 kg/cm², while test specimen number 10 showed that HT had the highest compressive strength at 247kg/cm². These findings suggest that in order to get more accurate results, CTM should be used in concrete testing

JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL CENDEKIA (JTSC)Vol. 6(1)
Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis Of Hammer Test And Compression Testing Machine Against Normal Concrete Compressive Strength Test K300 — Retnowati Setioningsih, Marwanto Marwanto, et al. · JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL CENDEKIA (JTSC) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS