The CSI effect in academia: influencing forensic science enrolment and perception in higher education

Abstract Background Television portrayals of forensic science, often referred to as the CSI effect , have been widely discussed in relation to their influence on public perceptions and jury expectations. Less explored, however, is how these portrayals shape prospective students’ motivations for enrolling in forensic science degrees and their perceptions of the subject’s academic content. This study investigates the extent to which popular forensic television programmes influence undergraduate student expectations of forensic science education and explores the discrepancies between those expectations and the realities of the curriculum. The research aims to inform curriculum design, expectation management, and student engagement strategies in higher education forensic programmes. Results Data were collected via a mixed-methods questionnaire from undergraduate students ( n = 123) enrolled in BSc Forensic Science and BA Criminology with Forensic Science programmes at a UK university. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyse closed- and open-ended responses. Findings indicate that a significant proportion (71.5%) of students reported popular forensic television as a factor influencing their decision to study the subject. However, many expressed surprise at the scientific depth of the curriculum, particularly regarding modules in chemistry, biology, and analytical science. Key thematic mismatches included unrealistic portrayals of evidence handling, timeframes, and investigative methods. A breakdown of findings by year of study showed that more senior students identified a greater number of technical inaccuracies in media portrayals. Although 87.8% recognised inaccuracies in television portrayals, the media remained a key influence on their understanding of the field. Conclusions The study reinforces previous research suggesting that media portrayals significantly shape student expectations of forensic science. These findings highlight a significant disconnect between media-shaped expectations and academic realities These expectation mismatches may impact student satisfaction, retention, and preparedness for careers in the field. Integrating media literacy into early curricula, alongside transparent course marketing and orientation strategies, may help align expectations with academic content and improve student engagement. The study adds to ongoing discussions about the CSI effect ’s influence on forensic education and student engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2025-07-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-025-00467-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The CSI effect in academia: influencing forensic science enrolment and perception in higher education

Daniel Preece, D. Ness
1 citations
Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Academic integrity and plagiarism
2.37
article

The CSI effect in academia: influencing forensic science enrolment and perception in higher education

Daniel Preece, D. Ness
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Television portrayals of forensic science, often referred to as the CSI effect , have been widely discussed in relation to their influence on public perceptions and jury expectations. Less explored, however, is how these portrayals shape prospective students’ motivations for enrolling in forensic science degrees and their perceptions of the subject’s academic content. This study investigates the extent to which popular forensic television programmes influence undergraduate student expectations of forensic science education and explores the discrepancies between those expectations and the realities of the curriculum. The research aims to inform curriculum design, expectation management, and student engagement strategies in higher education forensic programmes. Results Data were collected via a mixed-methods questionnaire from undergraduate students ( n = 123) enrolled in BSc Forensic Science and BA Criminology with Forensic Science programmes at a UK university. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyse closed- and open-ended responses. Findings indicate that a significant proportion (71.5%) of students reported popular forensic television as a factor influencing their decision to study the subject. However, many expressed surprise at the scientific depth of the curriculum, particularly regarding modules in chemistry, biology, and analytical science. Key thematic mismatches included unrealistic portrayals of evidence handling, timeframes, and investigative methods. A breakdown of findings by year of study showed that more senior students identified a greater number of technical inaccuracies in media portrayals. Although 87.8% recognised inaccuracies in television portrayals, the media remained a key influence on their understanding of the field. Conclusions The study reinforces previous research suggesting that media portrayals significantly shape student expectations of forensic science. These findings highlight a significant disconnect between media-shaped expectations and academic realities These expectation mismatches may impact student satisfaction, retention, and preparedness for careers in the field. Integrating media literacy into early curricula, alongside transparent course marketing and orientation strategies, may help align expectations with academic content and improve student engagement. The study adds to ongoing discussions about the CSI effect ’s influence on forensic education and student engagement.

Egyptian Journal of Forensic SciencesVol. 15(1)
Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.