Mammography Classification: How Useful is Machine Learning? A Radiomics Study and Future Perspectives

This study investigates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML)-based radiomics in classifying mammographic lesions. Leveraging the publicly available CBIS-DDSM and the matRadiomics toolbox, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models were tested across progressively larger training sets. LDA achieved the highest performance, demonstrating excellent discrimination between masses and calcifications (AUC of 97.08%, Accuracy of 95.63%). However, classification of benign versus malignant lesions yielded lower AUCs of 68.28% for microcalcifications and 61.53% for masses highlighting the limitations of traditional ML approaches. These findings point toward the need for more advanced methods, such as deep learning, in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cbms65348.2025.00033
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mammography Classification: How Useful is Machine Learning? A Radiomics Study and Future Perspectives

Giovanni Pasini, Alessandro Stefano, Franco Marinozzi, Giorgio Ivan Russo et al.
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Mammography Classification: How Useful is Machine Learning? A Radiomics Study and Future Perspectives

Giovanni Pasini, Alessandro Stefano, Franco Marinozzi, Giorgio Ivan Russo, Fabiano Bini, Nicolò Lauciello, Eleonora Giovagnoli
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML)-based radiomics in classifying mammographic lesions. Leveraging the publicly available CBIS-DDSM and the matRadiomics toolbox, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models were tested across progressively larger training sets. LDA achieved the highest performance, demonstrating excellent discrimination between masses and calcifications (AUC of 97.08%, Accuracy of 95.63%). However, classification of benign versus malignant lesions yielded lower AUCs of 68.28% for microcalcifications and 61.53% for masses highlighting the limitations of traditional ML approaches. These findings point toward the need for more advanced methods, such as deep learning, in future research.

National Research Council (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mammography Classification: How Useful is Machine Learning? A Radiomics Study and Future Perspectives — Giovanni Pasini, Alessandro Stefano, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS