A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Mortality Prediction in Liver Transplant Candidates

Current models for predicting waitlist mortality among liver transplant (LT) candidates primarily rely on conventional statistical regression-based approaches, which are typically developed separately for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC patients. These linear models may fail to capture complex, nonlinear relationships in the data, limiting their predictive performance. In this study, we evaluate and compare existing clinical scoring systems against various machine learning (ML) models, including both linear and nonlinear approaches, with a particular focus on a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) framework. Our results demonstrate that MTL outperforms both conventional methods and single-task learners across HCC and non-HCC groups. Furthermore, by leveraging SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), we provide deeper insights into the MTL model's decision-making process, offering both global and local explanations while pinpointing key risk factors for waitlist mortality in both patient groups. This study highlights the potential of advanced ML methodologies to improve LT organ allocation and underscores the need for their broader adoption in clinical practice, pending prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cbms65348.2025.00102
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Mortality Prediction in Liver Transplant Candidates

Abdelghani Halimi, Ilias Kounis, Sonia Garcia-Salicetti, Nesma Houmani et al.
1 citations
Machine Learning in Healthcare
2.48
article

A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Mortality Prediction in Liver Transplant Candidates

Abdelghani Halimi, Ilias Kounis, Sonia Garcia-Salicetti, Nesma Houmani, Audrey Coilly
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Current models for predicting waitlist mortality among liver transplant (LT) candidates primarily rely on conventional statistical regression-based approaches, which are typically developed separately for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC patients. These linear models may fail to capture complex, nonlinear relationships in the data, limiting their predictive performance. In this study, we evaluate and compare existing clinical scoring systems against various machine learning (ML) models, including both linear and nonlinear approaches, with a particular focus on a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) framework. Our results demonstrate that MTL outperforms both conventional methods and single-task learners across HCC and non-HCC groups. Furthermore, by leveraging SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), we provide deeper insights into the MTL model's decision-making process, offering both global and local explanations while pinpointing key risk factors for waitlist mortality in both patient groups. This study highlights the potential of advanced ML methodologies to improve LT organ allocation and underscores the need for their broader adoption in clinical practice, pending prospective validation.

Inserm (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (FR), Hôpital Paul-Brousse (FR), Télécom SudParis (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Mortality Prediction in Liver Transplant Candidates — Abdelghani Halimi, Ilias Kounis, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS