The Double Burden of School Choice

School choice policy shifts the responsibility of accessing high-quality schools from the state to parents, yet there is little research on how parents subjectively experience the burdens of choosing schools. In this case study, we conducted interviews and focus groups with 36 parents attending traditional public, charter, and private schools across six school districts in Colorado, Louisiana, and Michigan to examine bureaucratic hassles in choice policy. We outline the administrative burdens of choice policies and how local policy design influenced the costs parents experienced. Despite policy efforts to improve equity and access in school choice, families dealt with uncertainty and waiting periods and ultimately felt disempowered by the process. School choice, we argue, placed a double burden on low-income Black and Latinx families through the learning, compliance, and psychological costs of choosing as well as the burden of responsibility for their child’s educational success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AERA Open
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251349179
Citations
1
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Double Burden of School Choice

Shira Haderlein, Hanora Tracy, Sarah Winchell Lenhoff, Emily Germain et al.
1 citations
AERA Open
School Choice and Performance
8.93
article

The Double Burden of School Choice

Shira Haderlein, Hanora Tracy, Sarah Winchell Lenhoff, Emily Germain, Huriya Jabbar, Jacob Alonso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

School choice policy shifts the responsibility of accessing high-quality schools from the state to parents, yet there is little research on how parents subjectively experience the burdens of choosing schools. In this case study, we conducted interviews and focus groups with 36 parents attending traditional public, charter, and private schools across six school districts in Colorado, Louisiana, and Michigan to examine bureaucratic hassles in choice policy. We outline the administrative burdens of choice policies and how local policy design influenced the costs parents experienced. Despite policy efforts to improve equity and access in school choice, families dealt with uncertainty and waiting periods and ultimately felt disempowered by the process. School choice, we argue, placed a double burden on low-income Black and Latinx families through the learning, compliance, and psychological costs of choosing as well as the burden of responsibility for their child’s educational success.

AERA OpenVol. 11
Tulane University (US), University of Southern California (US), Wayne State University (US), California Southern University (US), Learning Policy Institute (US), Mathematica Policy Research (US)
Institute of Education Sciences, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
School Choice and Performance
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Double Burden of School Choice — Shira Haderlein, Hanora Tracy, et al. · AERA Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS