Fixing the ‘Polycrisis’ in Local Government Finance: the Limits of More Incremental Reform

Abstract Amid financial pressure and distress on an unprecedented scale and scope, the National Audit Office has made another telling contribution to understanding the current ‘polycrisis’ in local government finance in England. Its analysis feeds into the wider debate about the Starmer government's agenda of seeking dividends from combining devolution, local government reorganisation, and financial reforms. The risk is that further incremental modifications avoid more fundamental questions about what local government is for and how it can be funded. For example, is it an agent of central government tasked with delivering local services or instead a democratically accountable local tier of the state governing place? Local self‐government principles can inform the more radical answers required, but the Starmer government's priorities are focussed elsewhere, and the highly centralised governance system sits alongside its mistrust of local government and its limited capacity. Yet, given local government's proximity to people's lives and its relatively more trusted status amongst the public, fixing its finances can make it more able to deliver the tangible positive change the government seeks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13562
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fixing the ‘Polycrisis’ in Local Government Finance: the Limits of More Incremental Reform

Andy Pike
The Political Quarterly
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Fixing the ‘Polycrisis’ in Local Government Finance: the Limits of More Incremental Reform

Andy Pike
article en

Abstract

Abstract Amid financial pressure and distress on an unprecedented scale and scope, the National Audit Office has made another telling contribution to understanding the current ‘polycrisis’ in local government finance in England. Its analysis feeds into the wider debate about the Starmer government's agenda of seeking dividends from combining devolution, local government reorganisation, and financial reforms. The risk is that further incremental modifications avoid more fundamental questions about what local government is for and how it can be funded. For example, is it an agent of central government tasked with delivering local services or instead a democratically accountable local tier of the state governing place? Local self‐government principles can inform the more radical answers required, but the Starmer government's priorities are focussed elsewhere, and the highly centralised governance system sits alongside its mistrust of local government and its limited capacity. Yet, given local government's proximity to people's lives and its relatively more trusted status amongst the public, fixing its finances can make it more able to deliver the tangible positive change the government seeks.

The Political QuarterlyVol. 96(3)
Newcastle University
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fixing the ‘Polycrisis’ in Local Government Finance: the Limits of More Incremental Reform — Andy Pike · The Political Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS