Soil Carbon Dynamics During Stand Rotation in Boreal Forests

ABSTRACT The utilisation of forest resources is frequently criticised for its adverse environmental impacts. In particular, the widespread use of rotation forestry practices, including clear‐cutting, is viewed as a threat to ecosystems. Clear‐cutting has short‐term impacts that turn the forest into a net carbon (C) source, but such modifications to the ecosystem also have long‐term effects. Any analyses of alternative management approaches should include at least one full rotation, which requires model extrapolations. In this study, we used data from a well‐documented series of long‐term forest monitoring sites in Finland (ICP Forests Level II), focusing on two recent clear‐cut sites—one dominated by Scots pine and the other by Norway spruce. These data were utilised to constrain a soil C model and to extrapolate two future scenarios: rotation forestry and set‐aside (unmanaged). We simulated these scenarios over a period exceeding one full rotation and compared the outcomes. Although the stand thinning events did not heavily affect the C balance of the studied sites, clear‐cutting did. Each clear‐cut event caused a negative soil organic carbon (SOC) balance for many decades. It took between 37 and 69 years (for Norway spruce and Scots pine, respectively) to reach a break‐even point in which soil C losses compensated for C uptake. Emissions from coarse harvest residuals represented the greatest C source after clear‐cutting, followed by fine roots and then foliage. When comparing such a scenario with a set‐aside scenario, the soil C budget of the managed stand after clear‐cut was negative until the first thinning or even until the following clear‐cut, while the set‐aside was always a C sink in soil. Thus, scenario analyses of forest C sequestration that disregard long‐term soil C dynamics following management interventions may lead to biased conclusions. As a management regime, rotation forestry was relatively ineffective when evaluated considering C sequestration as an important ecosystem service.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Soil Science
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70154
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Tree Root and Stability Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Carbon Dynamics During Stand Rotation in Boreal Forests

Raisa Mäkipää, Liisa Ukonmaanaho, Saija Huuskonen, Päivi Merilä et al.
3 citations
European Journal of Soil Science
Tree Root and Stability Studies
2.14
article

Soil Carbon Dynamics During Stand Rotation in Boreal Forests

Raisa Mäkipää, Liisa Ukonmaanaho, Saija Huuskonen, Päivi Merilä, Aleksi Lehtonen, Antti‐Jussi Lindroos, Lorenzo Menichetti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The utilisation of forest resources is frequently criticised for its adverse environmental impacts. In particular, the widespread use of rotation forestry practices, including clear‐cutting, is viewed as a threat to ecosystems. Clear‐cutting has short‐term impacts that turn the forest into a net carbon (C) source, but such modifications to the ecosystem also have long‐term effects. Any analyses of alternative management approaches should include at least one full rotation, which requires model extrapolations. In this study, we used data from a well‐documented series of long‐term forest monitoring sites in Finland (ICP Forests Level II), focusing on two recent clear‐cut sites—one dominated by Scots pine and the other by Norway spruce. These data were utilised to constrain a soil C model and to extrapolate two future scenarios: rotation forestry and set‐aside (unmanaged). We simulated these scenarios over a period exceeding one full rotation and compared the outcomes. Although the stand thinning events did not heavily affect the C balance of the studied sites, clear‐cutting did. Each clear‐cut event caused a negative soil organic carbon (SOC) balance for many decades. It took between 37 and 69 years (for Norway spruce and Scots pine, respectively) to reach a break‐even point in which soil C losses compensated for C uptake. Emissions from coarse harvest residuals represented the greatest C source after clear‐cutting, followed by fine roots and then foliage. When comparing such a scenario with a set‐aside scenario, the soil C budget of the managed stand after clear‐cut was negative until the first thinning or even until the following clear‐cut, while the set‐aside was always a C sink in soil. Thus, scenario analyses of forest C sequestration that disregard long‐term soil C dynamics following management interventions may lead to biased conclusions. As a management regime, rotation forestry was relatively ineffective when evaluated considering C sequestration as an important ecosystem service.

European Journal of Soil ScienceVol. 76(4)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
European Commission, Academy of Finland, Maa- ja MetsätalousministeriÖ, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Tree Root and Stability Studies
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.