Sociolinguistic Analysis of Imprecations Through Theoretical Lenses: A Comparative Study Across Uzbek, Russian, And English Societies

This article explores the sociolinguistic significance of imprecations (curses) as a discursive practice embedded in cultural norms, gender dynamics, and power structures. Through an integrated comparison of the theoretical insights of William Labov, Erving Goffman, Deborah Tannen, Janet Holmes, Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, and Judith Butler, the study evaluates how curses function as expressions of identity, resistance, and social control in Uzbek, Russian, and English-speaking societies. Using a comparative sociolinguistic methodology, it demonstrates how curses operate across social strata, genders, and communicative contexts. The findings underscore the performative, symbolic, and stratifying functions of imprecations, while revealing their discursive potential to resist and reproduce social hierarchies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/volume05issue05-73
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociolinguistic Analysis of Imprecations Through Theoretical Lenses: A Comparative Study Across Uzbek, Russian, And English Societies

Raykhona Gulomova
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Sociolinguistic Analysis of Imprecations Through Theoretical Lenses: A Comparative Study Across Uzbek, Russian, And English Societies

Raykhona Gulomova
article en

Abstract

This article explores the sociolinguistic significance of imprecations (curses) as a discursive practice embedded in cultural norms, gender dynamics, and power structures. Through an integrated comparison of the theoretical insights of William Labov, Erving Goffman, Deborah Tannen, Janet Holmes, Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, and Judith Butler, the study evaluates how curses function as expressions of identity, resistance, and social control in Uzbek, Russian, and English-speaking societies. Using a comparative sociolinguistic methodology, it demonstrates how curses operate across social strata, genders, and communicative contexts. The findings underscore the performative, symbolic, and stratifying functions of imprecations, while revealing their discursive potential to resist and reproduce social hierarchies.

American Journal Of Philological SciencesVol. 5(5)
Uzbek State University of World Languages (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sociolinguistic Analysis of Imprecations Through Theoretical Lenses: A Comparative Study Across Uzbek, Russian, And English Societies — Raykhona Gulomova · American Journal Of Philological Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS