Evidence-Based Educational Interventions for Developing and Improving Reading Comprehension in Adolescents

The aim of this article is to review empirical studies, meta-analyses and systematic reviews on educational interventions for developing and improving reading comprehension in adolescents, including both typically developing readers and those experiencing reading difficulties. We distinguish seven intervention types aimed at improving reading comprehension, each targeting different components as the basis for intervention: decoding and reading fluency, working memory, vocabulary, inferential skills, metacognitive skills, logical-semantic analysis of text structure, and reading motivation. We evaluate the evidence supporting their effectiveness, as well as data on the relationship between each component and reading comprehension. All interventions reviewed, except for working memory training, have some evidence of effectiveness. However, among the interventions whose outcomes has been examined in multiple meta-analyses, reported effect sizes vary dramatically, ranging from small to moderate and large. Several open questions remain, such as the problem of learning transfer and duration of effects, as well as the replicability of interventions and their outcomes across different contexts — languages, samples, and educational systems. The current review can serve as a starting point for practitioners and researchers interested in the development and implementation of evidence-based reading interventions in Russia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy Obrazovaniya/ Educational Studies Moscow
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2025-20957
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-Based Educational Interventions for Developing and Improving Reading Comprehension in Adolescents

Nikita Otstavnov, Elena L. Grigorenko, Tatiana I. Logvinenko, A. V. Streltsova et al.
Voprosy Obrazovaniya/ Educational Studies Moscow
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Evidence-Based Educational Interventions for Developing and Improving Reading Comprehension in Adolescents

Nikita Otstavnov, Elena L. Grigorenko, Tatiana I. Logvinenko, A. V. Streltsova, Irina A. Arakelyan, Tatiana A. Kustova, Alexandra E. Ivanova
article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to review empirical studies, meta-analyses and systematic reviews on educational interventions for developing and improving reading comprehension in adolescents, including both typically developing readers and those experiencing reading difficulties. We distinguish seven intervention types aimed at improving reading comprehension, each targeting different components as the basis for intervention: decoding and reading fluency, working memory, vocabulary, inferential skills, metacognitive skills, logical-semantic analysis of text structure, and reading motivation. We evaluate the evidence supporting their effectiveness, as well as data on the relationship between each component and reading comprehension. All interventions reviewed, except for working memory training, have some evidence of effectiveness. However, among the interventions whose outcomes has been examined in multiple meta-analyses, reported effect sizes vary dramatically, ranging from small to moderate and large. Several open questions remain, such as the problem of learning transfer and duration of effects, as well as the replicability of interventions and their outcomes across different contexts — languages, samples, and educational systems. The current review can serve as a starting point for practitioners and researchers interested in the development and implementation of evidence-based reading interventions in Russia.

Voprosy Obrazovaniya/ Educational Studies Moscow(2)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), St Petersburg University (RU), University of Cologne (DE), Sirius University of Science and Technology (RU), University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.