What treatment should be used in patients with advanced breast cancer progressing during hormone therapy combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor?

The standard of 1st or 2nd line palliative systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer expressing hormone receptors without overexpression of HER2 is the combination of hormone therapy (HT) with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 4/6 (CDK4/6i). Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared to HT alone. Moreover, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant and ribociclib to fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor prolongs overall survival (OS). Importantly, the combined therapy is characterized by a preferable toxic profile. Unfortunately, in the case of progression during HT in combination with CDK4/6i, the available drugs do not give such spectacular results in terms of efficacy or toxicity profile. In patients progressing during treatment with CDK4/6i in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor not selected for predictive factors for targeted therapy or in the absence of such factors, another line of HT (switching to fulvestrant or exemestane), or chemotherapy should be used. Both treatment strategies have a similar effect on prognosis. Combining another CDK4/6i or everolimus with HT slightly improves its effectiveness but is associated with additional toxicity. In patients with the ESR1 mutation, elacestrant is significantly more effective compared to fulvestrant. In patients with the PIK3CA mutation, alpelisib or capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant can be used. In patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, a PARP inhibitor (PARPi, talazoparib, olaparib) prolongs PFS compared to chemotherapy without affecting OS. In patients with progression during treatment with the combination of CDK4/6i and fulvestrant, chemo­therapy, exemestane, or abemaciclib can be used. Elacestrant and PARPi are indicated in patients with corresponding mutations. In patients progressing after previous HT and palliative chemotherapy, the efficacy of conjugates of antibody and a cytotoxic drug (sacituzumab govitecan; trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low patients) has been demonstrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5603/ocp.106196
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What treatment should be used in patients with advanced breast cancer progressing during hormone therapy combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor?

Piotr Potemski, Sylwia Dębska-Szmich
1 links
Oncology in Clinical Practice
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

What treatment should be used in patients with advanced breast cancer progressing during hormone therapy combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor?

Piotr Potemski, Sylwia Dębska-Szmich
article en

Abstract

The standard of 1st or 2nd line palliative systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer expressing hormone receptors without overexpression of HER2 is the combination of hormone therapy (HT) with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 4/6 (CDK4/6i). Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared to HT alone. Moreover, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant and ribociclib to fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor prolongs overall survival (OS). Importantly, the combined therapy is characterized by a preferable toxic profile. Unfortunately, in the case of progression during HT in combination with CDK4/6i, the available drugs do not give such spectacular results in terms of efficacy or toxicity profile. In patients progressing during treatment with CDK4/6i in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor not selected for predictive factors for targeted therapy or in the absence of such factors, another line of HT (switching to fulvestrant or exemestane), or chemotherapy should be used. Both treatment strategies have a similar effect on prognosis. Combining another CDK4/6i or everolimus with HT slightly improves its effectiveness but is associated with additional toxicity. In patients with the ESR1 mutation, elacestrant is significantly more effective compared to fulvestrant. In patients with the PIK3CA mutation, alpelisib or capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant can be used. In patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, a PARP inhibitor (PARPi, talazoparib, olaparib) prolongs PFS compared to chemotherapy without affecting OS. In patients with progression during treatment with the combination of CDK4/6i and fulvestrant, chemo­therapy, exemestane, or abemaciclib can be used. Elacestrant and PARPi are indicated in patients with corresponding mutations. In patients progressing after previous HT and palliative chemotherapy, the efficacy of conjugates of antibody and a cytotoxic drug (sacituzumab govitecan; trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low patients) has been demonstrated.

Oncology in Clinical PracticeVol. 21(3)
Medical University of Lodz (PL), Central Clinical Hospital (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.