Biology of modeling: revisiting Humberto Maturana’s philosophy

Abstract The paper presents modeling as more than interpretation of signs. Although this term is often associated with AI, a method of operating AI, or operating with AI in the human task environment, it may also be understood as the ability of any form of life to realize its living in general. Both these understandings of modeling can be too narrow and too broad to cope with one of the main problems it poses for semiotics and beyond – the elusive explanatory nature of models and/or their misuse in an effort to explain life and its relational ecology. Drawing on Humberto Maturana’s biological epistemology, I propose a systemic approach to modeling, as well as elaborating on supersession, a functional and operative substitution of the modeled by the model. In its biological account, modeling is a repetitive and/or recursive way in which the organism arises and operates as a system capable of finding (and distinguishing) itself as a primary source of all happenings in, around, and with it. The system, the composite unity, conserves the composition its components compose and deals with the consequences of this conservation by continuing (projecting) what has been conserved onto the space that affords further conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Semiotic Studies
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2025-2009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biology of modeling: revisiting Humberto Maturana’s philosophy

Andrey S. Druzhinin
1 citations
Chinese Semiotic Studies
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
article

Biology of modeling: revisiting Humberto Maturana’s philosophy

Andrey S. Druzhinin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The paper presents modeling as more than interpretation of signs. Although this term is often associated with AI, a method of operating AI, or operating with AI in the human task environment, it may also be understood as the ability of any form of life to realize its living in general. Both these understandings of modeling can be too narrow and too broad to cope with one of the main problems it poses for semiotics and beyond – the elusive explanatory nature of models and/or their misuse in an effort to explain life and its relational ecology. Drawing on Humberto Maturana’s biological epistemology, I propose a systemic approach to modeling, as well as elaborating on supersession, a functional and operative substitution of the modeled by the model. In its biological account, modeling is a repetitive and/or recursive way in which the organism arises and operates as a system capable of finding (and distinguishing) itself as a primary source of all happenings in, around, and with it. The system, the composite unity, conserves the composition its components compose and deals with the consequences of this conservation by continuing (projecting) what has been conserved onto the space that affords further conservation.

Chinese Semiotic StudiesVol. 21(2)
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.