Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of early fetal demise at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore.

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of first-trimester missed abortion at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore. Period: 15 November 2024 to 15 February 2025. Methods: A total of 110 female patients aged 18–45 years with a confirmed diagnosis of first-trimester missed abortion (gestational age <14 weeks) were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A received oral misoprostol (400μg every six hours, up to three doses), and Group B received vaginal misoprostol (400μg soaked in normal saline, every six hours, up to three doses). Primary outcomes included treatment efficacy (complete uterine evacuation within 24 hours) and the need for surgical evacuation. Secondary outcomes included the mean time to expulsion and adverse effects such as bleeding, pain, vomiting, fever, and diarrhea. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, with a chi-square test used to compare efficacy between groups. Results: The efficacy of vaginal misoprostol (93.1%) was significantly higher than oral misoprostol (75.0%) (p=0.009). The mean time to expulsion was shorter in the vaginal group (10.87±2.0 hours) compared to the oral group (13.24±2.0 hours). The need for surgical evacuation was significantly higher in the oral group (25.0%) than in the vaginal group (6.9%) (p=0.009). Adverse effects, including bleeding, abdominal pain, vomiting, fever, and diarrhea, were comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol is more effective, results in faster expulsion, and significantly reduces the need for surgical evacuation compared to oral misoprostol. Given its superior clinical outcomes, vaginal misoprostol should be considered the preferred method for the medical management of first-trimester missed abortion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Professional Medical Journal
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2025.32.07.9165
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of early fetal demise at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore.

Fatima Khalid Qazi, Shereen Sukhan, Razia Fatima, Naheed Jamal Faruqi et al.
The Professional Medical Journal
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
article

Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of early fetal demise at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore.

Fatima Khalid Qazi, Shereen Sukhan, Razia Fatima, Naheed Jamal Faruqi, Zermina Azhar, Iqra Ajmal
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of first-trimester missed abortion at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore. Period: 15 November 2024 to 15 February 2025. Methods: A total of 110 female patients aged 18–45 years with a confirmed diagnosis of first-trimester missed abortion (gestational age <14 weeks) were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A received oral misoprostol (400μg every six hours, up to three doses), and Group B received vaginal misoprostol (400μg soaked in normal saline, every six hours, up to three doses). Primary outcomes included treatment efficacy (complete uterine evacuation within 24 hours) and the need for surgical evacuation. Secondary outcomes included the mean time to expulsion and adverse effects such as bleeding, pain, vomiting, fever, and diarrhea. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, with a chi-square test used to compare efficacy between groups. Results: The efficacy of vaginal misoprostol (93.1%) was significantly higher than oral misoprostol (75.0%) (p=0.009). The mean time to expulsion was shorter in the vaginal group (10.87±2.0 hours) compared to the oral group (13.24±2.0 hours). The need for surgical evacuation was significantly higher in the oral group (25.0%) than in the vaginal group (6.9%) (p=0.009). Adverse effects, including bleeding, abdominal pain, vomiting, fever, and diarrhea, were comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol is more effective, results in faster expulsion, and significantly reduces the need for surgical evacuation compared to oral misoprostol. Given its superior clinical outcomes, vaginal misoprostol should be considered the preferred method for the medical management of first-trimester missed abortion.

The Professional Medical JournalVol. 32(07)
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (GB), Karachi Medical and Dental College (PK), Royal College of Emergency Medicine (GB), Farooq Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.