Solving forward problems of boundary-layer problems in ordinary differential equations via physics-informed derivative networks

In this paper, we employ a deep learning approach based on the physics-informed derivative network (PIDN) to solve forward problems of boundary layer ordinary differential equations, including the classical Blasius and Falkner–Skan equations as well as other parameter-sensitive cases. Despite using a relatively small network with only a few neurons, the data-driven solutions generated by PIDN closely match those obtained through traditional numerical methods. Compared to conventional physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which often rely on large-scale networks, our approach significantly improves both training stability and computational efficiency with a minimal network. Moreover, evaluations across a wide range of parameter settings and interval lengths demonstrate that PIDN remains highly robust, even on extensive dimensionless intervals. Overall, these findings confirm the remarkable effectiveness and stability of the PIDN method for solving a variety of complex boundary layer problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0271360
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solving forward problems of boundary-layer problems in ordinary differential equations via physics-informed derivative networks

Yijun Sun, Guangjin Li, Hongmin Ren, Kaiwei Cong
Physics of Fluids
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Solving forward problems of boundary-layer problems in ordinary differential equations via physics-informed derivative networks

Yijun Sun, Guangjin Li, Hongmin Ren, Kaiwei Cong
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we employ a deep learning approach based on the physics-informed derivative network (PIDN) to solve forward problems of boundary layer ordinary differential equations, including the classical Blasius and Falkner–Skan equations as well as other parameter-sensitive cases. Despite using a relatively small network with only a few neurons, the data-driven solutions generated by PIDN closely match those obtained through traditional numerical methods. Compared to conventional physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which often rely on large-scale networks, our approach significantly improves both training stability and computational efficiency with a minimal network. Moreover, evaluations across a wide range of parameter settings and interval lengths demonstrate that PIDN remains highly robust, even on extensive dimensionless intervals. Overall, these findings confirm the remarkable effectiveness and stability of the PIDN method for solving a variety of complex boundary layer problems.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(7)
Northeast Petroleum University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.