Organizational and individual factors of the spin-off process from academic laboratories: an exploratory case study in life sciences

Purpose: Combining economic and psychological perspectives, identify some of the main factors that influence academic scientists' decisions whether to start or not a spin-off process. Aims: The study considers both economic and psychological outlooks by employing, on a business perspective, some already validated psychological frameworks. Methodology/approach: To explore the motivation and critical questions that may lead scientists to start, or not, an academic spin-off company, a two-level perspective is applied: an organizational level and an individual level. The survey was answered by 59 volunteer faculty or non-clinical researchers with research focused on life science fields. The total number of members of the survey universe was 148, so the response rate was 40%. Findings: Since the aim was to explore trends and motivations, not to test hypotheses, inferential statistical tests were not used but just descriptive statistics tools. The study allowed to identify the aspects to be considered in academic. policies to promote research valorisation processes through starting spin-off companies. Limitations of the study: The study is subject to several limitations, some of which are common to qualitative research in general and some of which are unique to the study design; namely (i) it is based on a purposefully selected sample; (ii) qualitative studies are subject to researcher bias; (iii) the findings may not be generalizable to other contexts. The results achieved may be validated through further research in other contexts, since entrepreneurial activities may vary according to different cultures. Practical implications: The study conducted leads us to argue that it is necessary - albeit not sufficient - to equip academic researchers with "right" knowledge and adequate relational capital to make the entrepreneurial challenge as desirable as a prosperous academic career. Value: The exploratory case study aims to analyse the “unconditional” entrepreneurial intentions of scientists regarding

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Resource Management
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46287/pdvm7729
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizational and individual factors of the spin-off process from academic laboratories: an exploratory case study in life sciences

Davide Dell’Anno
Journal of Human Resource Management
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

Organizational and individual factors of the spin-off process from academic laboratories: an exploratory case study in life sciences

Davide Dell’Anno
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Combining economic and psychological perspectives, identify some of the main factors that influence academic scientists' decisions whether to start or not a spin-off process. Aims: The study considers both economic and psychological outlooks by employing, on a business perspective, some already validated psychological frameworks. Methodology/approach: To explore the motivation and critical questions that may lead scientists to start, or not, an academic spin-off company, a two-level perspective is applied: an organizational level and an individual level. The survey was answered by 59 volunteer faculty or non-clinical researchers with research focused on life science fields. The total number of members of the survey universe was 148, so the response rate was 40%. Findings: Since the aim was to explore trends and motivations, not to test hypotheses, inferential statistical tests were not used but just descriptive statistics tools. The study allowed to identify the aspects to be considered in academic. policies to promote research valorisation processes through starting spin-off companies. Limitations of the study: The study is subject to several limitations, some of which are common to qualitative research in general and some of which are unique to the study design; namely (i) it is based on a purposefully selected sample; (ii) qualitative studies are subject to researcher bias; (iii) the findings may not be generalizable to other contexts. The results achieved may be validated through further research in other contexts, since entrepreneurial activities may vary according to different cultures. Practical implications: The study conducted leads us to argue that it is necessary - albeit not sufficient - to equip academic researchers with "right" knowledge and adequate relational capital to make the entrepreneurial challenge as desirable as a prosperous academic career. Value: The exploratory case study aims to analyse the “unconditional” entrepreneurial intentions of scientists regarding

Journal of Human Resource ManagementVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.