DiagX-DT: diagnostic exclusion reasoning with dialectical thinking for traditional Chinese medicine in large language models

The essence of syndrome differentiation in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) lies in dynamically filtering and associating symptoms to reach dialectical conclusions. However, while large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in various domains, they struggle to replicate the context-sensitive and exclusionary reasoning required for syndrome differentiation in TCM, primarily because they are typically trained on structured data that does not account for the complex and iterative reasoning process inherent in TCM. In this paper, we propose DiagX-DT, a novel diagnostic framework that integrates dialectical thinking with exclusion-based reasoning to enhance TCM diagnosis using LLMs. Our method first prompts the LLM to generate an initial answer along with a multi-step reasoning chain, while simultaneously extracting the initial probability distribution over candidate options from the model’s final output layer. Then, external structured TCM knowledge bases are utilized to iteratively exclude implausible choices based on treatment contradictions and diagnostic mismatches. After each exclusion, the remaining option set is used to recompute a normalized probability distribution. A recombination-evaluation module dynamically selects the top-scoring candidate under a confidence threshold mechanism to produce the final diagnosis. We evaluate DiagX-DT on three benchmark TCM choice diagnostic datasets, and experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and robustness compared to standard LLM baselines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44443-025-00123-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DiagX-DT: diagnostic exclusion reasoning with dialectical thinking for traditional Chinese medicine in large language models

Daozhi Xu, Yongbin Qin, Yulin Zhou, Guoxia Nie
1 citations
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
2.38
article

DiagX-DT: diagnostic exclusion reasoning with dialectical thinking for traditional Chinese medicine in large language models

Daozhi Xu, Yongbin Qin, Yulin Zhou, Guoxia Nie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The essence of syndrome differentiation in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) lies in dynamically filtering and associating symptoms to reach dialectical conclusions. However, while large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in various domains, they struggle to replicate the context-sensitive and exclusionary reasoning required for syndrome differentiation in TCM, primarily because they are typically trained on structured data that does not account for the complex and iterative reasoning process inherent in TCM. In this paper, we propose DiagX-DT, a novel diagnostic framework that integrates dialectical thinking with exclusion-based reasoning to enhance TCM diagnosis using LLMs. Our method first prompts the LLM to generate an initial answer along with a multi-step reasoning chain, while simultaneously extracting the initial probability distribution over candidate options from the model’s final output layer. Then, external structured TCM knowledge bases are utilized to iteratively exclude implausible choices based on treatment contradictions and diagnostic mismatches. After each exclusion, the remaining option set is used to recompute a normalized probability distribution. A recombination-evaluation module dynamically selects the top-scoring candidate under a confidence threshold mechanism to produce the final diagnosis. We evaluate DiagX-DT on three benchmark TCM choice diagnostic datasets, and experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and robustness compared to standard LLM baselines.

Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information SciencesVol. 37(5)
Guizhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
2.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.