In-Progress: Structured Pruning in the Wild: Benchmarking Practical Robustness Under Real-World Corruptions

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are widely adopted in Internet-of-Things(IoT) applications, where real-time deployment on resource-constrained edge devices is critical. However, when these devices operate in uncontrolled environments, the input they process is often imperfect and subject to various types of corruption, such as noise, blur, or adversarial perturbations. While numerous structured pruning methods have demonstrated their ability to maintain model performance under benign conditions - while simultaneously providing computational efficiency and storage benefits - it remains unclear how well they perform when faced with real-world corrupted inputs. Do these pruning techniques maintain robustness in such challenging scenarios, or do they significantly degrade in performance? Furthermore, pruning methods designed to be adversarially robust claim to withstand certain targeted perturbations, but do they actually generalize? This pilot study aims to investigate these questions by systematically benchmarking several well-established structured pruning techniques applied to CNNs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/spw67851.2025.00055
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-Progress: Structured Pruning in the Wild: Benchmarking Practical Robustness Under Real-World Corruptions

Huong Thi Le, Jiwen Zhang, Shaochen Zhong, Xia Hu
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

In-Progress: Structured Pruning in the Wild: Benchmarking Practical Robustness Under Real-World Corruptions

Huong Thi Le, Jiwen Zhang, Shaochen Zhong, Xia Hu
article en

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are widely adopted in Internet-of-Things(IoT) applications, where real-time deployment on resource-constrained edge devices is critical. However, when these devices operate in uncontrolled environments, the input they process is often imperfect and subject to various types of corruption, such as noise, blur, or adversarial perturbations. While numerous structured pruning methods have demonstrated their ability to maintain model performance under benign conditions - while simultaneously providing computational efficiency and storage benefits - it remains unclear how well they perform when faced with real-world corrupted inputs. Do these pruning techniques maintain robustness in such challenging scenarios, or do they significantly degrade in performance? Furthermore, pruning methods designed to be adversarially robust claim to withstand certain targeted perturbations, but do they actually generalize? This pilot study aims to investigate these questions by systematically benchmarking several well-established structured pruning techniques applied to CNNs.

Rice University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.