Quantitative Metrics for Smart Spaces

This paper introduces novel quantitative metrics for evaluating the performance of occupant identification and tracking models in multi-building smart spaces. We evaluate two state transition system models: the Centralized State Transition System (CSTS) and the Distributed State Transition System (DSTS). Both are probabilistic models characterized by events, state transition functions, and states. Events abstract biometric recognition, transition functions capture state changes, and states provide the foundation for information retrieval. To systematically compare these models, we introduce two figures of merit, for comparing event-level and state-level behavior, respectively. Experimental results indicate that CSTS outperforms DSTS in their figures of merit, demonstrating greater accuracy, however, DSTS remains a viable alternative in scenarios where building-specific structure and reduced state update complexity offer advantages. Our findings emphasize that both models have their strengths, and also that different scenarios may require different metrics for a more nuanced understanding of system performance and comparison.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/smartcomp65954.2025.00104
Primary Topic
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Metrics for Smart Spaces

Lakshmi Mohan, Vivek Menon, Bharat Jayaraman
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
article

Quantitative Metrics for Smart Spaces

Lakshmi Mohan, Vivek Menon, Bharat Jayaraman
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces novel quantitative metrics for evaluating the performance of occupant identification and tracking models in multi-building smart spaces. We evaluate two state transition system models: the Centralized State Transition System (CSTS) and the Distributed State Transition System (DSTS). Both are probabilistic models characterized by events, state transition functions, and states. Events abstract biometric recognition, transition functions capture state changes, and states provide the foundation for information retrieval. To systematically compare these models, we introduce two figures of merit, for comparing event-level and state-level behavior, respectively. Experimental results indicate that CSTS outperforms DSTS in their figures of merit, demonstrating greater accuracy, however, DSTS remains a viable alternative in scenarios where building-specific structure and reduced state update complexity offer advantages. Our findings emphasize that both models have their strengths, and also that different scenarios may require different metrics for a more nuanced understanding of system performance and comparison.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantitative Metrics for Smart Spaces — Lakshmi Mohan, Vivek Menon, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS