Study of Separation Efficacy and Pain with Various Commonly Used Orthodontic Separators

Background: Normally, adjacent teeth maintain a tight interproximal contact with each other. Therefore, their separation is required to allow for the placement of orthodontic bands. Different types of separators like brass wires, latex elastics, elastomeric and spring-type steel separators have been used in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: This study is conducted to check the amount of separation achieved in maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars on application of three different types of separators i.e., Elastomeric separators, custom-made Kesling separators made of 0.018” Australian wire with double helix and 0.020” Australian wire with single helix. In 45 patients Kesling separators made of 0.018”, 0.020” Australian wire and elastomeric separators were inserted on right and left sides respectively. Separation was checked and compared after 48 hours of insertion and pain perception was checked using visual analogue scale at 1 hour, 24 hours and 48 hours of insertion in young adult subjects. Results: Significantly more separation occurred at sites where elastic separators were used compared to 0.018” Kesling separator with double helix and 0.020” Kesling separator with single helix. Between 0.018” and 0.020” Kesling types, more amount of separation occurred at the site where 0.018” Kesling separators were used. Conclusion: Separation caused by elastic separators was maximum while that of 0.020” Kesling separator with single helix caused minimum separation in both maxillary arch as well as in mandibular arch.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-2407016774
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study of Separation Efficacy and Pain with Various Commonly Used Orthodontic Separators

Honey Jivrani, Yazad Daruwala, Pallav Udeshi
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences
Dental Research and COVID-19
article

Study of Separation Efficacy and Pain with Various Commonly Used Orthodontic Separators

Honey Jivrani, Yazad Daruwala, Pallav Udeshi
article en

Abstract

Background: Normally, adjacent teeth maintain a tight interproximal contact with each other. Therefore, their separation is required to allow for the placement of orthodontic bands. Different types of separators like brass wires, latex elastics, elastomeric and spring-type steel separators have been used in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: This study is conducted to check the amount of separation achieved in maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars on application of three different types of separators i.e., Elastomeric separators, custom-made Kesling separators made of 0.018” Australian wire with double helix and 0.020” Australian wire with single helix. In 45 patients Kesling separators made of 0.018”, 0.020” Australian wire and elastomeric separators were inserted on right and left sides respectively. Separation was checked and compared after 48 hours of insertion and pain perception was checked using visual analogue scale at 1 hour, 24 hours and 48 hours of insertion in young adult subjects. Results: Significantly more separation occurred at sites where elastic separators were used compared to 0.018” Kesling separator with double helix and 0.020” Kesling separator with single helix. Between 0.018” and 0.020” Kesling types, more amount of separation occurred at the site where 0.018” Kesling separators were used. Conclusion: Separation caused by elastic separators was maximum while that of 0.020” Kesling separator with single helix caused minimum separation in both maxillary arch as well as in mandibular arch.

IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical SciencesVol. 27(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Dental Research and COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.