The Self-Regulation for AI-Based Learning Scale: Psychometric Properties and Validation

Artificial intelligence technologies are transforming university students' learning processes, making self-regulation skills increasingly crucial. However, existing self-regulation scales inadequately reflect AI-assisted learning environments' unique dynamics. This study developed the Self-Regulation for AI-Based Learning Scale (SRAILS) for university students and examined its psychometric properties. The scale comprises four main dimensions and nine sub-dimensions: motivational components (intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, self-efficacy), cognitive/metacognitive strategies, time and task management, resource management, and technological adaptation. The study included 750 university students from various Turkish faculties. Exploratory Factor Analysis supported construct validity, while Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the nine-factor structure, demonstrating good model fit. Convergent and discriminant validity were established. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega reliability coefficients ranged from .853-.913. Criterion-related validity was confirmed through significant positive correlations between all scale dimensions and external criteria: academic GPA, technology interest, and digital literacy levels (r = .20-.60, p < .01). SRAILS provides a comprehensive, reliable assessment of students' self-regulation skills in AI-assisted learning environments. This scale contributes originally to literature by enabling personalized learning experience design and supporting effective instructional strategy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Current Educational Studies
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijces.176
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Self-Regulation for AI-Based Learning Scale: Psychometric Properties and Validation

Eyüp Yurt
7 citations
International Journal of Current Educational Studies
Education and Learning Interventions
22.72
article

The Self-Regulation for AI-Based Learning Scale: Psychometric Properties and Validation

Eyüp Yurt
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technologies are transforming university students' learning processes, making self-regulation skills increasingly crucial. However, existing self-regulation scales inadequately reflect AI-assisted learning environments' unique dynamics. This study developed the Self-Regulation for AI-Based Learning Scale (SRAILS) for university students and examined its psychometric properties. The scale comprises four main dimensions and nine sub-dimensions: motivational components (intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, self-efficacy), cognitive/metacognitive strategies, time and task management, resource management, and technological adaptation. The study included 750 university students from various Turkish faculties. Exploratory Factor Analysis supported construct validity, while Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the nine-factor structure, demonstrating good model fit. Convergent and discriminant validity were established. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega reliability coefficients ranged from .853-.913. Criterion-related validity was confirmed through significant positive correlations between all scale dimensions and external criteria: academic GPA, technology interest, and digital literacy levels (r = .20-.60, p < .01). SRAILS provides a comprehensive, reliable assessment of students' self-regulation skills in AI-assisted learning environments. This scale contributes originally to literature by enabling personalized learning experience design and supporting effective instructional strategy development.

International Journal of Current Educational StudiesVol. 4(1)
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Education and Learning Interventions
22.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.