Evaluating the efficacy of thinning and prescribed fire for restoring mature forest characteristics in the Eastern Cascades, USA

Abstract Historical fire exclusion, intensive logging of large trees of fire-tolerant species, and even-aged management have contributed to widespread decline of mature/old-growth coniferous forests across the Western USA. To investigate silvicultural approaches for reducing disturbance risk while accelerating restoration of mature/old-growth forest characteristics, we used 20-year data from the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area study in Northern California, USA. Established to evaluate the alternatives for reducing fuels and accelerating the development of late-seral characteristics in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa)/white fir (Abies concolor) mixed-conifer forests, the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area study consists of (i) an untreated Control, (ii) a Big Tree treatment using thinning from below to favor large trees of any species, (iii) a Pine Emphasis treatment combining thinning from below with radial thinning, group selection harvesting, and artificial regeneration to favor ponderosa pine while increasing structural complexity, and (iv) a Pine Emphasis with Fire treatment with postthinning prescribed burns added to (iii). Our objectives were to determine whether and how (i) treatments altered stand structure and composition and (ii) the dynamics of ecologically valuable large trees and snags varied by treatment. To accomplish this, we built generalized linear mixed models to compare treatment effects on stocking, structural complexity, composition, growth dominance, large-tree dynamics, and large-snag dynamics. We found that all the treatments initially lowered stocking relative to the Control, but Pine Emphasis with Fire was notably more successful in maintaining the stocking/fuel reduction. Both Pine Emphasis treatments maintained vertical and horizontal structural complexity. Pine Emphasis with Fire was most effective in restoring composition toward ponderosa pine dominance. Treatments did not discernably alter growth dominance, large-tree recruitment/mortality, or the large-snag recruitment/decay condition. Our results indicate that the Pine Emphasis with Fire treatment shows the greatest potential for accelerating restoration of mature/old-growth characteristics in ponderosa pine/mixed-conifer forests, while reducing longer term risk from fire and other disturbances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaf039
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the efficacy of thinning and prescribed fire for restoring mature forest characteristics in the Eastern Cascades, USA

Martin W. Ritchie, Christopher E. Looney
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Evaluating the efficacy of thinning and prescribed fire for restoring mature forest characteristics in the Eastern Cascades, USA

Martin W. Ritchie, Christopher E. Looney
article en

Abstract

Abstract Historical fire exclusion, intensive logging of large trees of fire-tolerant species, and even-aged management have contributed to widespread decline of mature/old-growth coniferous forests across the Western USA. To investigate silvicultural approaches for reducing disturbance risk while accelerating restoration of mature/old-growth forest characteristics, we used 20-year data from the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area study in Northern California, USA. Established to evaluate the alternatives for reducing fuels and accelerating the development of late-seral characteristics in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa)/white fir (Abies concolor) mixed-conifer forests, the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area study consists of (i) an untreated Control, (ii) a Big Tree treatment using thinning from below to favor large trees of any species, (iii) a Pine Emphasis treatment combining thinning from below with radial thinning, group selection harvesting, and artificial regeneration to favor ponderosa pine while increasing structural complexity, and (iv) a Pine Emphasis with Fire treatment with postthinning prescribed burns added to (iii). Our objectives were to determine whether and how (i) treatments altered stand structure and composition and (ii) the dynamics of ecologically valuable large trees and snags varied by treatment. To accomplish this, we built generalized linear mixed models to compare treatment effects on stocking, structural complexity, composition, growth dominance, large-tree dynamics, and large-snag dynamics. We found that all the treatments initially lowered stocking relative to the Control, but Pine Emphasis with Fire was notably more successful in maintaining the stocking/fuel reduction. Both Pine Emphasis treatments maintained vertical and horizontal structural complexity. Pine Emphasis with Fire was most effective in restoring composition toward ponderosa pine dominance. Treatments did not discernably alter growth dominance, large-tree recruitment/mortality, or the large-snag recruitment/decay condition. Our results indicate that the Pine Emphasis with Fire treatment shows the greatest potential for accelerating restoration of mature/old-growth characteristics in ponderosa pine/mixed-conifer forests, while reducing longer term risk from fire and other disturbances.

Forestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 99(1)
Pacific Southwest Research Station (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.