Comparative Structural and Mechanical Characterization of <scp>FDM 3D</scp> ‐Printed <scp>PLA</scp> Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

ABSTRACT Cellular scaffolds can provide morphological and mechanical integrity with human bone. Various structural designs have been studied; however, their structural and mechanical properties have not been sufficiently compared under the same conditions. This study investigates the effect of unit cell type and size on the dimensional accuracy, porosity accuracy, pore size, and compressive properties of cellular polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds. These scaffolds were additively manufactured using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) method. Three levels of unit cell type and unit cell sizes were investigated. Strut‐based cubic, octet, and surface‐based gyroid structures with 2.5, 3, and 4 mm unit cell sizes were designed, fabricated, and characterized. The scaffolds were created with a constant porosity of 60%. A two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to identify the significance of unit cell type and size on the measured characteristics. Unit cell type and size significantly impact structural and mechanical properties, as well as the printability of the scaffolds. The structures exhibit trabecular bone‐like mechanical properties, with deformation behavior more dependent on unit cell type than unit cell size. Results show preferability to gyroid structures, with recommendations for enhancing their porosity accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers for Advanced Technologies
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.70257
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Structural and Mechanical Characterization of FDM 3D ‐Printed PLA Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

Abdallah Abdelkawy, Mahmoud A. Adly, Ashraf Adel, Reham Reda
4 citations
Polymers for Advanced Technologies
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
2.70
article

Comparative Structural and Mechanical Characterization of FDM 3D ‐Printed PLA Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

Abdallah Abdelkawy, Mahmoud A. Adly, Ashraf Adel, Reham Reda
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cellular scaffolds can provide morphological and mechanical integrity with human bone. Various structural designs have been studied; however, their structural and mechanical properties have not been sufficiently compared under the same conditions. This study investigates the effect of unit cell type and size on the dimensional accuracy, porosity accuracy, pore size, and compressive properties of cellular polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds. These scaffolds were additively manufactured using the fused deposition modeling (FDM) method. Three levels of unit cell type and unit cell sizes were investigated. Strut‐based cubic, octet, and surface‐based gyroid structures with 2.5, 3, and 4 mm unit cell sizes were designed, fabricated, and characterized. The scaffolds were created with a constant porosity of 60%. A two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to identify the significance of unit cell type and size on the measured characteristics. Unit cell type and size significantly impact structural and mechanical properties, as well as the printability of the scaffolds. The structures exhibit trabecular bone‐like mechanical properties, with deformation behavior more dependent on unit cell type than unit cell size. Results show preferability to gyroid structures, with recommendations for enhancing their porosity accuracy.

Polymers for Advanced TechnologiesVol. 36(7)
Suez University (EG), Cairo University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.