Characterizing Teacher Knowledge Tests and Their Use in the Mathematics Education Literature

We present findings from an analysis of tests of teacher mathematical knowledge identified over a 20-year period of mathematics education literature. This analysis is part of a larger project aimed at developing a repository of instruments and their associated validity evidence for use in mathematics education. We report on how these tests are discussed in the literature, with a focus on validity arguments and evidence. A key finding is that these tests are often presented in ways that do not support their use by the mathematics education community. We offer suggestions on how adopting a validity argument perspective can enable others to build on initial test development efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2022-0137
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing Teacher Knowledge Tests and Their Use in the Mathematics Education Literature

James Smith, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj, Wendy Smith, Michele Carney et al.
1 citations
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
8.93
article

Characterizing Teacher Knowledge Tests and Their Use in the Mathematics Education Literature

James Smith, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj, Wendy Smith, Michele Carney, Heather Howell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present findings from an analysis of tests of teacher mathematical knowledge identified over a 20-year period of mathematics education literature. This analysis is part of a larger project aimed at developing a repository of instruments and their associated validity evidence for use in mathematics education. We report on how these tests are discussed in the literature, with a focus on validity arguments and evidence. A key finding is that these tests are often presented in ways that do not support their use by the mathematics education community. We offer suggestions on how adopting a validity argument perspective can enable others to build on initial test development efforts.

Journal for Research in Mathematics EducationVol. 56(4)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Boise State University (US), Educational Testing Service (US), Arizona State University (US), California State University, Long Beach (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.